Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    International Bar Association

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Content about the association's comments on the Israel-Hamas war has been recently added. Air on White (talk) 23:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And the content is really just in passing, among a list of all the other recent international conflicts it has condemned. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israeli Israel–Hamas war ceasefire proposal

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – PIA. Air on White (talk) 06:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator El C. under that name; inherited by Three-phase Israel–Hamas war ceasefire proposal. Will log at CTOPS if it hasn't been already. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Iraq

    Indefinate Extended-Confirmed Protection: Persistent disruptive editing by auto-confirmed accounts. The revision history shows disruption from auto-confirmed accounts. 70.50.199.125 (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It seems the page editors are handling it well enough. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Asad Muazzam

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 08:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Afro fusion

    Reason: Repetitive disruptive editing or vandalism by anonymous IP addresses. Qaqaamba (talk) 12:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked: 105.116.1.0/24 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from article for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Secular Naturalism

    Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Indefinite full protection. User keeps using Wikipedia user pages as an advertisement. 48JCLTALK 12:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    (non-admin comment) Probably better to just block. Air on White (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    User(s) blocked: Secular Naturalism (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. blocked indef as NOTHERE. Daniel Case (talk) 20:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User_talk:TarnishedPath

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: my user talk is being disruptively edited by a editor that I have specifically told not to edit on my user talk. WP:AE recently filled against them. Need temporary protection until such time that the AE case is finished. TarnishedPathtalk 12:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Rana Atif

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Farrukh Habib

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Mian Tahir Pervaz

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Zartaj Gul

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sheikh Rasheed Ahmad

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Shahid Javed

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Muhammad Riaz Shahid

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Muhammad Ismael

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:26, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Usman Dar

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Aseefa Bhutto Zardari

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ishaq Dar

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ali Afzal Sahi

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Geo News

    Reason: Vandalised many times The Washington from Layallpur (talk) 13:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2024 Kids' Choice Awards

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP address ping pong over the last couple of days, adding guessed contestants. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Rob Burrow

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Constant vandalism and disruptive edits by many IP users Wiiformii (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Most of the recent reverted edits were additions of his death before it was confirmed. Since it has been, that's no longer an issue. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Yash Shah

    Indefinite move protection: The title in the main namespace is protected due to repeat creation by sock accounts. This new version was recently created and moved to a new title Yash Shah (Yogi). Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/VRAJESH SHAH‎‎ for more details. GSS💬 18:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    List of iPad models

    Temporary semi-protection: The anonymous users are constantly changing color codes to ones that are WRONG and it's not stopping. I request temporary anonymous protection for around three months. Proof: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_iPad_models&action=history and talk page request: Talk:List of iPad models Stephen"Zap" (talk) 18:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blessing Ejiofor

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalised too much in a short while, maybe for 24ths would do. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    One Thousand and One Nights

    Reason: Persistent IP vandalism and edit warring. Skitash (talk) 20:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Israel-Hamas War

    I would like to request that... (the map be updated to show that Israel now controls the entire Gaza-Egypt border) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @LordOfWalruses this is not the place. Contentious topics should not be unprotected. 48JCLTALK 12:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @48JCL: Unregistered and non-extended-confirmed editors are allowed to request edits to ARBPIA pages here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The talk page Talk:Israel-Hamas War is protected, therefore edit requests by non-extended-confirmed users land here. That is acceptable, and this request made above is reasonable. The people who actually do participate on that talk page should be reviewing requests here that remain open and haven't been declined for days. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    New York City

    most populous city in the United States to most popular city in the United States 2003:D2:CF20:692D:AC84:8FDF:F65E:C6B1 (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done – Unsourced claim for something that's inherently unquantifiable. Favonian (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually it is quantifiable. The measurement would be tourist visits. In that respect, based on sources I found, New York City does indeed come out number one when considering only US cities, in terms of both foreign tourism as well as domestic tourism. For US states, on the other hand New York isn't even in the top three. But changing "populous" to "popular" is just wrong and vague, and doesn't reflect the sources already cited. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.