This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete. Rje 17:59, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, pokemon fancruft. Megan1967 06:25, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Don't they have their own websites to fill with every last bit of tedious minutae on their favourite game? Average Earthman 10:41, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Wikipedia is not the Encyclopedia of Pokemon. Some of this stuff would be too crufty even for an Encyclopedia of Pokemon. --BM 02:38, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Gotta delete 'em all. (Just kiddin, inclusionists) Carrp | Talk 04:04, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Serves no useful purpose, even as a Pokemon article. -- Cabhan 05:09, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.