Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Imagism

Imagism[edit]

Mainly self-nom, although I did not create the page and many others have contributed. This is part of planned set of (hopefully) featured articles including Modernist poetry in English, H.D., The Cantos, Samuel Beckett, James Joyce and more to come. I feel it gives a good historical overview of an important literary movement. Improvements suggested on WP:PR have been implemented to the best of my ability. Filiocht | Blarneyman 07:43, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

Support: I sometimes wonder if Filiocht is not a very famous writer and critic writing incognito, which then means I must be even more clever and literary to have spotted him and his brilliant articles. Giano | talk 22:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I often ask myself the same question; the answer is always no, sadly. Filiocht | Blarneyman 07:19, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Support. This article is well researched, provides good context (important for lay people like me), makes easy reading, and looks pretty. Give us more of this! — mark ✎ 11:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. What could've been a quagmire of literary confusion is an easily-read, informative, and comprehensive description of an influential artistic movement. --Jacj 21:18, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support unreservedly. Beautiful work. -- Rbellin|Talk 20:26, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Very well-written. --DanielNuyu 08:10, 15 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Great article --nixie 00:31, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support: This is one of those places where our coverage far exceeds anything a reader could find on any other site on the Internet. It truly does represent the finest writing and research on Wikipedia. Geogre 11:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Comes close to perfect. Themanwithoutapast 14:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Lovely lucid prose and informative material that answered questions I did not know I had. --Theo (Talk) 15:27, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]