Talk:Shebaa Farms

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tweaks to the introduction for balance and clarity[edit]

I suggest:

Documents from the 1920s and 1930s indicate that inhabitants paid taxes to the Lebanese government, while maps of the French Mandate from the 1930s and 1940s show the area as part of Syria. Syria was the de facto ruling power from the end of the French Mandate in 1946 until Israel's occupation of the Golan Heights in the Six-Day War.

10:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Utilisateur19911 (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s Lebanese territory that is occupied. This is not disputed at all.[edit]

The occupation of Shebaa is not disputed. Lead paragraph is misleading. Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 13:51, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I clarified what had become muddled over the years. nableezy - 14:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Looks great Lebanesebebe123 (talk) 05:30, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelled Word[edit]

Occupied is written as occupued thanks to 13 day old edit. 68.180.95.120 (talk) 01:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks. Zerotalk 02:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

fix text[edit]

In 1981, the Golan Heights, including the Shebaa Farms, were annexed by Israel, a move only recognized by the United States. Israel considers it part of the Golan Heights ++++AND++++ continues to hold it, along with the Golan, under military occupation. please add the word 'AND' above, or whatever is required. Wikiqrdl (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

fixed. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 07:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Military Occupation?[edit]

Given that Israel annexed the Golan Heights (including the Shebaa farms), I think it's incorrect to say the area is under "military occupation", the way that the West Bank is. It's a territory in dispute, yes, but not under occupation. Jeb1075 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]