Talk:Jan Zamoyski

Untitled

Nie lepiej go przesunac pod Jan Zamoyski?--Emax 22:16, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Gdzies czytalem cytat z Zamojskiego, ale nie pamietam dokladnie slow - moze ktos z was pamieta: "Dalbym sobie prawa reke uciac, by was widziec katolikami, ale dwie rece oddam, aby nikt was sila do tego nie zmuszal" Szopen 11:41, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Nice quote, but doesn't ring a bell.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Correction:

"Kiedyby to mogło być, abyście wszyscy mogli być papieżnikami, dałbym za to połowę zdrowia mojego, żebym drugą połową żyjąc, cieszył się z tej świętej jedności. Ale jeśli kto będzie wam gwałt czynił, dam wszystko swe zdrowie przy was, abym na tą niewolę nie patrzył" - so the version with the hand was misquotation. http://www.abcnet.com.pl/pl/artykul.php?art_id=1687&token= "If I could see you all catholics, I would give a half of my health for that, so I could be happy from this saint unity while living with second part of my health. But if someone would force you, I would give all my health to your case, so not to see such slavery" Szopen 12:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Zamoyczycy

I am removing the fragment about the existence of a group of his followers called "zamojczycy"/"zamoyczyc", as I cannot find any reliable refs confirming the use of that term. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

B-class

Passed by milhist reviewer, confirmed by me for WP:POLAND. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jan Zamoyski/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 00:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}

Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

1: Well-written

• a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
• b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

WP:LEAD:

Check for WP:LEAD: Check for Correct Structure of Lead Section:  Done Check for Citations (WP:LEADCITE):  Done Check for Introductory text:  Done Check for Provide an accessible overview (MOS:INTRO):  Done Check for Relative emphasis:  Done Check for Opening paragraph (MOS:BEGIN):  Done Check for First sentence (WP:LEADSENTENCE):  Done Check for Format of the first sentence (MOS:BOLDTITLE):  Done Check for Proper names and titles:  Done Check for Abbreviations and synonyms (MOS:BOLDSYN): None Check for Foreign language (MOS:FORLANG): None Check for Pronunciation: None Check for Contextual links (MOS:CONTEXTLINK):  Done Check for Biographies: NA Check for Organisms: NA Check for Biographies of living persons: NA Check for Alternative names (MOS:LEADALT):  Done Check for Non-English titles: Check for Usage in first sentence: Check for Separate section usage: Check for Length (WP:LEADLENGTH):  Done Check for Clutter (WP:LEADCLUTTER): None

WP:LAYOUT:

Done Check for WP:LAYOUT:  Done Check for Body sections: WP:BODY, MOS:BODY.  Done Check for Headings and sections:  Done Check for Section templates and summary style:  Done Check for Paragraphs (MOS:PARAGRAPHS):  Done Check for Standard appendices and footers (MOS:APPENDIX):  Done Check for Order of sections (WP:ORDER):  Done Check for Works or publications:  Done Check for See also section (MOS:SEEALSO):  Done Check for Notes and references (WP:FNNR):  Done Check for Further reading (WP:FURTHER):  Done Check for External links (WP:LAYOUTEL):  Done Check for Links to sister projects:  Done Check for Navigation templates:  Done Check for Formatting:  Done Check for Images (WP:LAYIM):  Done Check for Links:  Done Check for Horizontal rule (WP:LINE):  Done

WP:WTW:

Done Check for WP:WTW:  Done Check for Words that may introduce bias:  Done Check for Puffery (WP:PEA):  Done Check for Contentious labels (WP:LABEL):  Done Check for Unsupported attributions (WP:WEASEL):  Done Check for Expressions of doubt (WP:ALLEGED):  Done Check for Editorializing (MOS:OPED):  Done Check for Synonyms for said (WP:SAY):  Done Check for Expressions that lack precision:  Done Check for Euphemisms (WP:EUPHEMISM):  Done Check for Clichés and idioms (WP:IDIOM):  Done Check for Relative time references (WP:REALTIME):  Done Check for Neologisms (WP:PEA): None Check for Offensive material (WP:F***):  Done Check for WP:MOSFICT:  Done Check for Real-world perspective (WP:Real world):  Done Check for Primary and secondary information (WP:PASI):  Done Check for Contextual presentation (MOS:PLOT):  Done

WP:EMBED:
Done Prose is preferred over list (WP:PROSE): Check for Tables (MOS:TABLES):

2: Verifiable with no original research

• a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
• b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google.)

WP:RS:

Done Check for WP:RS:  Done Cross-checked with other FAs: Józef Piłsudski (mainly), Witold Pilecki, Polish-Soviet War, History of Poland (1945-1989), Katyń massacre, History of Solidarity, Polish culture during World War II Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING): (not contentious)  Done Is it contentious?: No Does the ref indeed support the material?: Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING):  Done Who is the author?: Does the author have a Wikipedia article?: What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?: What else has the author published?: Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?: Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING):  Done Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS):

WP:MINREF:
Done Check for inline citations WP:MINREF:  Done Check for Direct quotations:  Done Check for Likely to be challenged:  Done Check for Contentious material about living persons (WP:BLP): NA

• c. No original research:  Done

WP:NOR:
Done Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY):  Done Check for synthesis (WP:SYN):  Done Check for original images (WP:OI):  Done

3: Broad in its coverage

a. Major aspects:

Done Cross-checked with other FAs: Józef Piłsudski (mainly), Witold Pilecki, Polish-Soviet War, History of Poland (1945-1989), Katyń massacre, History of Solidarity, Polish culture during World War II Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources: Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS: Check for Out of scope: Check for The range of material that belongs in the article: Check for All material that is notable is covered: Check for All material that is referenced is covered: Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered: Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge: Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC):

b. Focused:
Done Check for Readability issues (WP:LENGTH): Check for Article size (WP:TOO LONG!):

4: Neutral

WP:NPOV:

Done 4. Fair representation without bias:  Done Check for POV (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for naming (WP:POVNAMING):  Done Check for structure (WP:STRUCTURE):  Done Check for Due and undue weight (WP:DUE):  Done Check for Balancing aspects (WP:BALASPS):  Done Check for Giving "equal validity" (WP:VALID):  Done Check for Balance (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for Impartial tone (WP:IMPARTIAL):  Done Check for Describing aesthetic opinions (WP:SUBJECTIVE):  Done Check for Words to watch (WP:YESPOV):  Done Check for Attributing and specifying biased statements (WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV):  Done Check for Fringe theories and pseudoscience (WP:PSCI): None Check for Religion (WP:RNPOV): None

5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes

6: Images  Done (PD)

Images:

Done 6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  Done Check for copyright tags (WP:TAGS):  Done Check for copyright status:  Done Check for non-free content (WP:NFC):  Done Check for valid fair use rationales (WP:FUR):  Done 6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  Done Check for image relevance (WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE):  Done Check for Images for the lead (WP:LEADIMAGE):  Done Check for suitable captions (WP:CAPTION):  Done

As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. The prose quality in particular has been fantastic in all your articles. I’m inspired a lot by your conscientiousness. Thanks, Piotrus, very much for your diligence in writing such great articles.

Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 22:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Latin form

is not -ść anything. What was it actually? — LlywelynII 02:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)