Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed.
Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about states with nuclear weapons. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about states with nuclear weapons at the Reference desk.
List of states with nuclear weapons is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Explosives, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Explosives on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ExplosivesWikipedia:WikiProject ExplosivesTemplate:WikiProject ExplosivesExplosives articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article was a featured list for a year about 15 years ago. Seems like most or all of the issues in the demotion thread are obsolete or resolved. I propose that we put it back up for promotion LbPirate (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Israel should be moved out of the presumed Category[edit]
Israeli Minister of Heritage Amihai Eliyahu said that "dropping an atomic weapon on Gaza is [a] the possible opt I think this qualifies them for admitting they have Nuclear Weapons.ions."
He was rebuked and suspended from his job for saying it, so it cannot be read to constitute official Israeli policy. NPguy (talk) 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Should Iran join Israel in the presumed category[edit]
I haven't done any proper research but according to the Wikipedia page for Iran's nuclear policy talks about Iran Having an amount of enrichment uranium that would not be needed for any civilian purposes. BUSHMAN1024 (talk) 19:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is an article in fox news about Iranian lawmaker declaring them having nuclear weapons. Given the fact that they making the bomb is not that complicated, but enrichment is (which they already seem to have done), may be worth including.
No. Iranian hardliners say lots of things that don't necessarily correspond to the facts. I won't comment on the reliability of Fox News on this sort of thing. NPguy (talk) 03:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]