Talk:Bytom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit[edit]

I saw your last edit ([1]) and I thought that this piece of information might be of some value to you: here in Poland the surname is usually preceded by the name, not the other way around. Please be so kind as to leave those Polish names written according to Polish grammar, not Hungarian. Halibutt (talk) 00:15, Nov 4, 2004 (UTC)

Symbols[edit]

I think much more can be said concerning the city's symbols (flag and coat of arms) then just describing them. Maybe somebody more familiar with the art and science of these symbols can expand upon this section. James084 02:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]


You can use this old photos http://picasaweb.google.com/dygrys/Beuthen# —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.184.168.219 (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review[edit]

Failed for WP:POLAND due to insufficient references and poor coverage of many topics (many sections are barely more than lists). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bytom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bytom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should I change this?[edit]

Bytom is 26.81 sq mi, not 2,681 sq mi like the page says. This will be very confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.193.153.230 (talk) 22:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Hiancinth chuch style (photo caption)[edit]

It should be Neo-Romanesque, not Neo-Romantic.

It is a neo- (19th century) version of a style which predates gothic.