Talk:Church of Scientology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Church of Scientology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Church of Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Church of Scientology, or anything not directly related to improving the Wikipedia article at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
celebs[edit]
sections about incidents of celeb endorsement should be added 216.164.249.213 (talk) 04:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Missing sections[edit]
This article is missing a section for "Service organizations". It should be placed before "Headquarters". Subsections should be:
- Class V orgs (missing)
- Ideal orgs (existing)
- Advanced orgs (missing)
- Freewinds (existing)
Service orgs are the Church of Scientology organizations where public individuals ("members") go to get their services (auditing and training). It is the income-producing strata of the entire network. Grorp (talk) 00:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[edit]
Long texts under pictures can stretch the picture frame sideways, much broader than actual pictures, and in some cases so much that on some monitors almost no text can be flowed by it's side.
I have tested putting line breaks </br> on suitable places in those lines and because in preview it reclaimed the wasted monitor space, published them.
User: Grorp reverted one of those with comment
Revert caption changes. they looked good on a cell phone but awful on a computer web browser. long captions automatically wrap
It seems my solution was not suitable for every configuration, but at the same time it seems his remark is not true in all environments. I worked on comp screen; before my change (and after revert) in my case long captions didn't. (and don't) automatically revert. It seems the problem (no automatical varp for long captions), which I fudged by inserting newline tags, might be environment (e.g. browser, and maybe even version) dependant. I used and older version of firefox at the time.
And you (Grorp) seem to have been right: in Opera on the same comp long captions do seem to get automatically warped, so I am reverting my other recent patchy picture caption changes.
- edit: he already reverted all of them before I could. In Firefox 115.4.0esr on this comp long picture captions are not automatically warped, and are again looking awful on this version of this computer web browser. When I am at some other comp I'll see if it's just this version or FF in general.
Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 16:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- I checked 3 computer browsers (Firefox, Edge & Brave) looking at the current version (wrapping captions) and your version with the line-breaks in them. I tried it logged in and logged out, and tried two Wikipedia skins: Vector 2022 (default) and Vector legacy 2010 (my preference). The non-line-break version wraps correctly in all cases. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 18:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused sources from "Works cited" section[edit]
All of the sources mentioned in the "Works cited" section are not actually referenced in the article itself. I'm putting them here in case anyone needs to use or restore them. I'm leaving one, Lamont 1986, in "Further reading" because it is focused on the organization(s) and most closely matches the subject material.
- Corydon, Bent; Hubbard, L. Ron Jr. (1987). L. Ron Hubbard: Messiah Or Madman?. New Jersey: Lyle Stuart. ISBN 0-8184-0444-2. OCLC 16130709.
- Lamont, Stewart (1986). Religion Inc.: The Church of Scientology. London: Harrap. ISBN 0-245-54334-1. OCLC 23079677.
- Melton, J. Gordon (2000). The Church of Scientology. Salt Lake City: Signature Press. ISBN 978-1-56085-139-4.
- Partridge, Christopher Hugh (2003). UFO Religions. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-26324-7. OCLC 51342721.
- Savino, John; Jones, Marie D. (2007). Supervolcano: The Catastrophic Event That Changed the Course of Human History. Career Press. ISBN 978-1-56414-953-4. OCLC 123539673.
▶ I am Grorp ◀ 06:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class Scientology articles
- Top-importance Scientology articles
- WikiProject Scientology articles
- B-Class Skepticism articles
- Mid-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Mid-importance Religion articles
- B-Class New religious movements articles
- High-importance New religious movements articles
- New religious movements articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- B-Class Inland Empire articles
- Low-importance Inland Empire articles
- Inland Empire task force articles
- B-Class Los Angeles articles
- Low-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English