Talk:Office of Strategic Influence (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOffice of Strategic Influence (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Office of Strategic Influence (album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I am beginning my review of this article. Reviewer: Torchiest (talk | contribs) 14:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    One small problem with the first sentence of the music section. Not sure what it supposed to say, looks like it's missing a word or two.
    B. MoS compliance:
    You've got a scattering of quotes that use quotation marks inside of them, like when song titles are referred to in quotations. You have to alternate between double and single quotes for each layer, see WP:MOSQUOTE for details.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    WP policy, as I understand it, is that every single instance of a quote must have a cite. You've got three quotes in the background section missing cites. You've got six missing cites in the recording section. You've got four in the music section, one in the release and promotion section. You've got ten missing cites in the reception section.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Overall, this is a really great article. You only have a few minor problems with getting the cites fixed, which I'm sure you've got covered in your sources. Just fix them up, and this is a definite pass.
Torchiest (talk | contribs) 15:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for taking the time to review the article! :)

However, I think some of the quotations you've counted as unsourced are in fact sourced in the correct manner. At my last GA the reviewer had the same issue with me not being thorough enough with the sourcing of quotations. However, they said that an extra citation wasn't required if there was a non-quote connecting two parts of the same quote (e.g. "and I was totally apolitical before this, politically naïve and I still am," Moore stated. "I was like, 'Whoa, what the fuck is going on in the world?'"[5] would be fine as the non-quoting part merely breaks up one continuous quote).

This may be an error on their part; if so I'll go in and make the relevant corrections. If not, I believe I've made all the corrections you've suggested. Again, thanks! Una LagunaTalk 21:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was a little iffy on that one you mentioned, and I think you're right that it's probably fine as it. The rest looks good. I'm going to pass this, but you still need to fix that one sentence I mentioned in 1A, as I'm not sure precisely what it's supposed to be saying. Otherwise, great work, and congrats. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 05:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops - didn't see that one. Hopefully I've made that sentence clearer now. Thanks again for taking the time to review the article! Time to finish off Free (OSI album)... Una LagunaTalk 09:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011[edit]

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

--CactusBot (talk) 11:09, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Office of Strategic Influence (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Office of Strategic Influence (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Office of Strategic Influence (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Office of Strategic Influence (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Office_of_Strategic_Influence_(album)&oldid=1211298131"