Talk:Pan-Green Coalition
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Taiwan may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Taipei Times article on the Pan-Purple Alliance: formed by several social activist and disadvantaged groups --Kaihsu 06:38, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Untitled[edit]
- The Pan-Purple Alliance is against the DPP. Why does it redirect here? --Jiang 10:48, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: It is not clear to me that this is a distinct subject but there is enough out there and has been created enough times that I am marking as reviewed and would encourage someone who disagrees to take it to AfD..
Barkeep49 (talk) 00:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Centrist?[edit]
If "Centre" is to be added to the political position of the infobox in the article, it needs a reliable source. The Democratic Progressive Party is leading the Pan-Green Coalition, while the Democratic Progressive Party and Pan-Green Coalition are not synonymous. Editing the political position of the Pan-Green Coalition as centrist with a source who referred to the DPP as "centrist" is a POV edit; per WP:SYNTH. For example, the Greens and Social Democrats are not centrist. ProKMT (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Green parties are often centrist; and it doesn't change that the centrist DPP is part of this coalition. This makes a centrist appellation more appropriate than center-left. Please stop removing high-quality reliable sources like Routledge just because they don't match your POV. Simonm223 (talk) 13:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Routledge source is relable sources, but the Routledge source doesn't say "Pan-Green [Coalition]" is a centrist. WP:ONUS rather proves Guotaian editing is wrong, and you are continuously restoring the POV editing of Guotaian. Again, all the sources put forward by Guotaian have only references to the "Democratic Progressive Party" but no references to the "Pan-Green Coalition".[1] I won't erase the "Center" of infoobox's political position for now because I don't want an edit dispute, but it's absolutely true that considering Pan-Green as a centrist itself is POV; the DPP is not the only member of the Pan-Green Coalition, and the Social Democratic Party, Green Party Taiwan, and Taiwan Statebuilding Party are more radical and left-leaning positions for Taiwan independence. ProKMT (talk) 07:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
References[edit]
References
- ^
- Derbyshire, J. Denis; Derbyshire, Ian (15 April 2016). Encyclopedia of World Political Systems. Vol. 1. Routledge. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-3174-7156-1. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
- The Economist. Economist Newspaper Limited. 2011. p. 58. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
- Business Asia. Business International Corporation. 2001. p. 40. Archived from the original on 12 April 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
- "Taiwan". Freedom in the World 2002. Freedom House. 2002. Archived from the original on 26 December 2019. Retrieved 26 December 2019.
- Start-Class Taiwan articles
- High-importance Taiwan articles
- WikiProject Taiwan articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Start-Class political party articles
- Low-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Taiwan