User talk:Jfconnolly

I was referring to your edits on my talk page. I'm glad that you've learned how to log in, but you still are not signing your posts, or doing any of the other suggestions I made on your old talk page here. I'm not going to repeat myself further, because I don't have time for this. Learn how to sign your posts. Learn how to put spaces in between sentences. Learn how to put new lines between paragraphs. If you can't learn any of these simple editing rules, I doubt that your edits to wikipedia will stay very long. Do not reply to this message, as I feel that I've repeated myself plenty of times. Again, goodbye and good luck editing Wikipedia. Cheers, DropDeadGorgias (talk) 20:41, Jan 27, 2005 (UTC)

Perversion of religion[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Perversion of religion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ashok Prasad has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 05:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And in more detail: in these edits, you usurped an article on one person to create an article on another, unrelated person. That second person you named "Ashok Prasad". It's obvious that "Ashok Prasad" is the same as Ashoka Prasad, also known as Ashoka Jahnavi-Prasad. Three years ago, one John Connolly of Canada was calling him Johnubiprasad: see this. The article on Ashoka Jahnavi-Prasad was deleted as a result of this discussion, and this deletion was later upheld here. Prasad is not going to get an article on Wikipedia, or anyway not until he becomes more notable. Do not again vandalize an article on somebody else in order to create an article on Prasad. -- Hoary (talk) 10:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Perversion of religion[edit]

I have nominated Perversion of religion, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perversion of religion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 15:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicions[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Vr (2nd). Thank you. Nil Einne (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]