Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dictionizzle
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Dictionizzle[edit]
"Dictionizzle" gets 18 Google hits, most of which show it to be the punchline of someone else's joke, not this private project with no signs of notability. Wikipedia is not a web guide. -- Antaeus Feldspar 05:26, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Yes it should come back when it's famous. Until then,
delizdelete Kappa 05:51, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC) - Delete --fvwizzle* 08:01, 2004 Dec 28 (UTC)
- Delete. utcursch 11:04, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: The "izzle" suffix is probably going to be transitory enough to escape lexicographizzle, but this is the shizzle. Geogre 15:18, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Deletizzle, wikipedia is not a web-guide. Rje 16:30, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, nn. Wyss 20:10, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delizzle, as instructizzled above. --Idont Havaname 04:36, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- And here I was hoping it had something to do with Snoop Doggy Dogg. Delete. 23skidoo 00:12, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Dizzle this non-notabizzle shizzle, my nizzle. Ливай | ☺ 08:08, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delzzille forshizzle thisizzle vanityizzle. Neutralitytalk 01:56, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Heheheh. Delete. Lacrimosus 08:17, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not even well written. --AmeenDausha 20:41, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.