This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
British Museum was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article relates to the British Museum. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one, as needed.British MuseumWikipedia:GLAM/British MuseumTemplate:WikiProject British MuseumBritish Museum-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
The first 2 sentences in the article have cited a direct source, the museum's website (source 3) WP:RS and therefore lack impartiality WP:NPOV. The first two sentences should be modified accordingly with a source that complies with Wikipedia guidelines. Tirishan (talk) 07:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Phooey! I don't know who you expect to count the objects, or the visitors, other than the museum itself. Johnbod (talk) 13:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what you mean by a "direct source". If you mean a self-published source, this is allowed under policy WP:RS : "Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, especially in articles about themselves, without the requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as the following criteria are met:
1) The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim..."
The statements in the lead don't seem unduly self-serving or exceptional to me and the British Museum is obviously in the best position to make a comment about its goals and the size of its collection. It's not a questionable source in this context. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is "among the largest and most comprehensive in existence", but there's a bit of WP:THESKYISBLUE about querying that. Johnbod (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On reflection, probably better to make the satement more definite and provide an independent source for it. I've made the change. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 00:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Identity of staff member who was fired in August 2023[edit]
To add to this article: the name of the staff member who was fired on August 16, 2023 for stealing and selling artifacts in the collection of the British Museum. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is an ongoing police investigation and the name of the alleged perpetrator is not important for the history of the Museum. Wikipedia is not a news organisation. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:04, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Murgatroyd49 Hi, pushpin maps lack a lot of metadata, additionally they are not zoomable. For other museums like Louvre Museum, this method is applied correctly. You should compare it with other museums, not with map used for other London venues. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 19:17, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a London venue, other London museums have pushpin maps. To change it, it would be advisable to seek concensus from other editors involved. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 19:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
