Talk:Korean Air

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Korean Air article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 365 days

This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airline project.

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Korean Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929071031/http://www.kal-asd.com/ to http://www.kal-asd.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929071031/http://www.kal-asd.com/ to http://www.kal-asd.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:28, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Calm scheme[edit]

Hello, please advise why my edit was deemed "not related". It has been added into the section "Loyalty programme", explaining where its name comes from. Thanks Goodwillgames (talk) 12:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Extensive information about the airline's frequent flyer program and amenities, etc should not be included. Remember that Wikipedia is not a travel guide so please focus on aircraft and airline destinations. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 12:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC) By focusing on airline destinations we would make a travel guide; by focusing on etymology of the Air Line names and schemes we make an encyclopedia. Aircraft models and routes’ details are already well available in the company’s website, whilst additions such as mine give alternative information to the corporate ones. By removing my entry, you just made the explanation of the whole company’s product less comprehensive. I intend to revert your edit and bring it to the Talk page for others to comment Goodwillgames (talk) 13:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Write the issue here. People can’t understand what you’re talking about if you only copy and paste my talk page. Thanks. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

Many, many other airlines on Wikipedia, including much smaller airlines, feature their own fleet page. Why not Korean? SurferSquall (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Make your case, people will chip in with their opinion. Just for the record, other stuff exists is not a sufficient argument. See WP:SPLIT for some reasons why a split might be appropriate, as well as the way to start a discussion that people might notice. Lithopsian (talk) 20:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding Lithopsian, and I'd also point out my comment at Talk:Asiana_Airlines#Split :3 F4U (they /it) 02:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any updates on this? Discussion seems to have virtually stopped and there doesn't seem to be strong momentum to split. I may close soon if nothing toobigtokale (talk) 02:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Necessity of splitting has not gone away, i might take a stab at it again SurferSquall (talk) 04:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind based on the Asiana thread it seemed like there was consensus objection to splitting; you're welcome to open second discussion but I predict it'll end similarly toobigtokale (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simply objecting that "there needs to be a split" does not provide an adequate reason to split. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 21:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to the WP:Guideline (WP:SIZERULE) only article with over 50 kB or 8000 words may be considered for split. As of now, current article prose size is only 15 kB (2512 words). So, no need to even to consider split article. Ckfasdf (talk) 09:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]