User talk:Pauli133

Welcome to the Wikipedia[edit]

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Sam Spade 12:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

you are correct[edit]

i apologize mi amigo, i assumed it was spelled wrong because of my stupid spell checker, dang sorry for acting like an idiot Arisedrew (talk) 18:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For a great job of reverting vandalism, including edit conflicting me on one, I hereby award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Your efforts keeping the encyclopedia clean are appreciated! Royal broil 13:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Pauli133! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 17:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

NASA GAR[edit]

hi Pauli133, I just wanted to let you know that the main NASA article is undergoing a Good Article Review. Most of the gruntwork is done now, and the article could use a fresh set of eyes to copy edit it, add more materiel, and offer suggestions and feedback. If you have a chance, I would appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks!
— $V = I * R$ (talk) 23:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work so far, thank you for chipping in. Keep it up, if you have the chance!
—

V = I * R

(talk) 23:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The-N[edit]

Why did you undo my edit? I removed the content because it's unsourced and the article required clean-up anyways. --70.121.35.167 (talk) 14:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

because you're an ip address, you blanked a section, and you didn't leave an edit summary. i'm not real good at leaving edit summaries myself, but something like that DOES require some explanation, especially when you see how it pops up in recent changes. pauli133 (talk) 14:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, there should be no "conditional" or "specialized" treatment toward me because I'm not a registered editor; there is no difference between the the two. While I probably should of left an edit summary, I did not because the article is in need of clean-up, as tagged on the article itself, and the section had no sources, which is visible even if you are reverting on a tool. Be careful and more observant next time. --70.121.35.167 (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use preview[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Loch Ness Monster, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Adambro (talk) 13:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing between sentences[edit]

I see tha you removed all my double spaces between sentences at The Fortune Hunter. Why did you do that? It is perfectly alright to have double spaces between sentences in Wikipedia articles, and I prefer it, as it helps me find each sentence when I am editing. Since I will be editing this article in the future, and you will not, it seems to me rude for you to delete these spaces. Please stop doing this to other editors, unless the article is an article on which you have done most of the work. Thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:33, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Layout of references[edit]

Hi, Pauli. I agree that horizontal layout of references is more preferable, particularly in case of stable articles. However, in case of active editing or poorly formatted references, it would be easier to make edits or format references if the vertical layout is used. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 21:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks aren't errors[edit]

This wasn't a particularly helpful edit. {{convert}} is useful, but stripping whitespace so that the reference templates are made unreadable and hard to maintain isn't, nor was removing redlinks. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP Cryptozoology in the Signpost[edit]

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Cryptozoology for a Signpost article to be published this month. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Also, if you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dwayne, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dwain and Dwaine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I linked to exactly the pages I intended to. pauli133 (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Pauli133. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pauli133. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

handball pages[edit]

the flags weren't displaying properly and removing the slash seemed to correct the issue, but since you added the slash back, the flags are still displayed correctly. I'm not sure what the issue was. It might have only been on my end. Day801 (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

no worries - i'm certainly not going to fault anyone for learning by trial and error! WP:BeBold and all that. I only noticed because I've been learning how to identify and fix lint errors. pauli133 (talk) 00:48, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pauli133. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref error[edit]

Hi there, just wanted to draw your attention to a formatting error caused by your recent changes to ARA Uruguay. It's under "First scientific expedition". I would fix it myself, but I'm not sure which of those references you meant to attach to the quote. When you have a moment, would you mind taking a look? Thank you! Jessicapierce (talk) 14:27, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

all fixed - I should have caught that previously, sorry! pauli133 (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ublist and sorting[edit]

Hello. You recently made this edit to replace use of {{ublist}} with s with edit summary "can't use {{ubl}} inside {{sort}}". The article uses ublist rather than line breaks for accessibility reasons per MOS:VLIST, and the sorting did work correctly on that article.

Please could you explain why it shouldn't be used inside the sort template, or point me to advice/explanation/usage notes somewhere. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 11:37, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, what's happening is that when {{ubl}} is inside {{sort}} (at least in the manner it's being used in these particular articles), it's generating a div-span-flip error and ending up on Lint errors: Miscellaneous Tidy replacement issues. I see where you're going with the accessibility thing, and that's cool - the thing to do now is find syntax that doesn't cause problems on either end.

In this particular case, separating the values with commas might work? May not be as tidy in terms of columns, though. pauli133 (talk) 11:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If the ublist was just moved out of the sort template, e.g. instead of

{{sort|1901–1913|{{ublist|1901–1909|1912–1913|list_style=text-align:center}}}}

having

would that stop the error occurring? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. {{ubl}} on its own is generally fine, it only causes issues when nested inside another template that can't cope with the rows. I'm not very familiar with how {{sort}} is supposed to behave, but if that will generate the proper output, it should solve the issue all round. pauli133 (talk) 12:09, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to generate the proper visible output, so I'll do that. Hope they don't reappear on your to-do list... cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:26, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Short footnotes[edit]

Hi, it took me a while to figure out short footnotes so I thought I would let you know you were very close in your edit on Cornelia Rau - the template:sfn works off the harvard system where the ID is taken from the author and year fields. To use a custom ID, such as "{{sfn|Four Corners transcript}}" the citation needs to be "ref=CITEREFFour Corners transcript". Cheers Find bruce (talk) 00:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

aha, thank you! It's a rather illusive bit of syntax to nail down, and I've run into trouble before when wandering away from the standard ref=harv stuff. I'll keep this in mind for next time. pauli133 (talk) 00:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, been there, drove me nuts until I figured it out. Feel free to ping me if you get stuck. Find bruce (talk) 10:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inadvertently getting into the middle of edit wars[edit]

Hey Pauli,

First off - you're doing great work, and thanks for all the improvements. I'd like to ask one little thing, though, that if you could pay attention to would make things even better: stay away from edit wars! By which I mean - if you see others engaged in an edit war (eg. in Collaboration in German-occupied Poland), wait with your improvements until they're finished. The way Wikipedia diffs pages, you can't filter out small changes like some of yours, so trying two compare two "major" revisions results in a "diff" littered with small template and linguistic changes that you have to skim through while looking for the controversial bits. So if you can wait a bit when these things happen (as far as you can tell) that would be excellent.

And for your good services, a cracker. François Robere (talk) 10:55, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Math[edit]

Please do not "fix" mathematical formulas by breaking their meaning, as you did in this change to Fano plane. In this instance, $n_{3}$ was correct, and n3 is both bad mathematical typesetting (the digits in a formula should never be italic) and mathematically meaningless. If you want to avoid using the {{math}} template family in citation titles, a better way would be to use <math>...</math>. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going through your earlier contributions, I see that your earlier "fix" to monoid was also bad. By removing the template you made the variable become Roman (the italic signs surrounding it were negated by the italicization of the rest of the title) when it should have remained italic. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you've got formatting that comes out the way you want and doesn't generate lint errors, please, by all means, use it. That's usually the extent of my interest, and I'm learning as I go, just like everybody else here. pauli133 (talk) 01:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page on the Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad[edit]

Hi, Pauli. Thank you for working on the citations at Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad. I am currently working on an updated draft of the article at User:Tamravidhir/sandbox2. It has content directly copied from the page in the main-space. Will be really thankful if you could look into the citations in the draft in my sandbox. Hoping to hear from you soon. Thank you! --Tamravidhir (talk) 17:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll be happy to take a look later on. If you've got a new draft that's going to be integrated into the current article, then that's definitely the place to be working - no point duplicating the work copying things back and forth. pauli133 (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At first perusal, it looks good. I take it that you're cutting back on poor/tenuous/questionable sources. Can the things attributed to royalark.net be traced back to more scholarly cites? I see that it has some bibliography. pauli133 (talk) 20:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--MrClog (talk) 16:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pauli.

I see that you are the last person to edit the Carson Beach, South Boston page before I added some brief history. I just wanted to reach out and thank you for your contribution. Even though you added your information a while ago, if you have time to look on the new content that I posted that would be awesome. Thanks!

Hrennen (talk) 19:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copa Rio[edit]

Hello Pauli, I modified the note 4 because the Intercontinental Cup was written in lower case, but now it appears as a reference and not as a note ... unfortunately I don't know how to create a note :-) --188.153.148.9 (talk) 17:49, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch on the capitalization! I've switched the format back to a note. If you want to learn the syntax for notes (they're pretty easy, really, but there's a LOT of powerful stuff available too), I found the best place to start was the template:efn documentation. And, conveniently, you've now got a diff in the Copa Rio history to compare. pauli133 (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work to fix lint errors[edit]

Thank you for your work to fix lint errors. In some cases, it would be nice to have an edit summary, for example:

Polynomial ring: your edit summary: (blank)
Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer: your edit summary: (blank)

Here is some of my recent work to fix lint errors:

Marriage Boot Camp: my edit summary: properly close italics (''); rm spurious close bold (''')
Montenegrins of Serbia: my edit summary: {{smaller|}} can't wrap {{hlist}}
Clarence McKinney: my edit summary: ... → ...; improve <ref>s

Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:39, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I tend not to bother with them on minor syntax repair. Of course they are helpful on less clearcut changes, which is where I do try and mention what I'm doing. Usually. pauli133 (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Documenting edits helps create awareness and encourages other editors to make similar fixes and not to make such errors in the first place. That's why I generally provide detailed edit summaries listing every change I made. —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Pauli133. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 22:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

White Huns[edit]

Hello Pauli133 - I'd like your opinion about the White Huns article after your recent edit. It's marked as a disambiguation page, but the article doesn't list "articles associated with the title White Huns" as the {{disambig}} implies. I think it should be converted to become a stub, and I would also mark it as unreferenced. What do you think? PK T(alk) 11:27, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds sensible to me. I'd also noticed that it was a disambiguation page, which seemed very strange: I think most readers are going there for "who WERE the White Huns?" reasons, not "oh yeah, I typed that as shorthand for this other group." Go for it! pauli133 (talk) 11:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I added categories to the article and WikiProject banners to the talk page - if any of them are off-base, please change as appropriate. Thanks very much! ......PK T(alk) 19:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Private Passions episodes, 2015-2019 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of Private Passions episodes, 2015-2019, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commented out graphs[edit]

Hi Pauli133! Re these edits, could you add to the hidden comment explaining why you commented them out? Otherwise, other editors won't know if/when it's okay to add them back. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 00:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that's a reasonable request - done. pauli133 (talk) 00:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding deluxe section on Eminem discography page[edit]

Hey @pauli. Can we add a sperate deluxe edition table on the em page like uzi and other artists. I think it would we worth it since a lot of his albums has them.

Thanks Rsbor (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you can. I don't know what rules the various WikiProjects have about discographies, so you might want to ask on the article's talk page. pauli133 (talk) 15:58, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of some of your pending edits[edit]

Hello. Unfortunately I was forced to revert some of your pending changes you made here because the prior and following edits were not constructive. All that is necessary is for you go back and redo your edits (they will be automatically accepted). Sorry for the inconvience. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I figured this was going to happen. No worries, and thank you for the heads up! pauli133 (talk) 23:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello. Huluxsi (talk) 20:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interlinear indent[edit]

Wait, so "indent" refers to an indent before the template? Not an indent within the words of the template? --Eievie (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In {{interlinear}}, |indent changes the location of the block of text. What seems to work best, from my (limited!) experience, is to set |indent=4 if there's no |number, and skip it if there is a |number. Examples:

{{interlinear}} yields

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem Ipsum

{{interlinear|indent=4}} yields

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem Ipsum

{{interlinear|number=1}} yields

1

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem Ipsum

{{interlinear|number=2|indent=4}} yields

2

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem Ipsum

{{interlinear|number=3|indent=0}} yields an especially ugly

3

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem Ipsum

:{{interlinear}} will give something like |indent=2 or 3, but will also generate invalid HTML5, aka lint errors (which is why @Jonesey95 and I notice it). Does that help? pauli133 (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of United States Supreme Court cases[edit]

Thank you for all of these revisions! I will follow your pattern for all future page revisions I make for the Lists of US Supreme Court cases. I appreciate it, and apologize for my sloppiness. Ballinacurra Weston (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! I found a batch of those pages with unclosed {{dts}} templates in the Special:LintErrors lists, and went ahead with some MOS fixes while I was at it. I'm glad to see someone is fleshing out those pages, which seem to largely be bare lists. Keep it up! pauli133 (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Our Lady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church of Our Lady. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

re William Keogh edits[edit]

The "DNB" is the Dictionary of National Biography. I added a tag linking to his entry at the bottom of the article. Brianyoumans (talk) 03:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for that. pauli133 (talk) 13:06, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not have a user page Pauli133[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Pauli133&action=edit&redlink=1 Creating User:Pauli133 Jump to navigationJump to search Wikipedia does not have a user page with this exact title. In general, this page should be created and edited by User:Pauli133.Cblambert (talk) 23:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States[edit]

Hello Pauli133. In case you weren't aware, the edit yesterday to Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has duplicate arguments "y7" and "y7Title", for North Carolina and Ohio. This is why the NC stats aren't showing in "> 2,000,000 positive test individuals". Tried to fix the duplicate myself, but backed away since I haven't got the data in front of me, and don't want to break the chart. Thanks, Storchy (talk) 10:50, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch! All fixed now. I'm used to the charts blowing up entirely if something like that happens - surprised that it didn't. Thanks for letting me know! pauli133 (talk) 12:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're warmly welcome. I'm deeply grateful for the work of you, Rider0101, and other editors, updating and maintaining one of the most important articles on Wikipedia at the moment.

But credit where due: I was only able to spot the duplicate using the excellent script User:Frietjes/findargdups. It's not just for emptying the maintenance category - when it's installed, it displays warnings of duplicate arguments in the edit preview. I get those warnings in preview just a little too often lately... :-D Storchy (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]