Talk:George Thomas, 1st Viscount Tonypandy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

From what does he derive his title? RickK 03:02, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Tonypandy seems to be a town in Wales, from a google search. Since Thomas was Welsh, I suppose this makes sense. It's possibly the greatest name for a peerage ever, imho. john 05:33, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

It was the site of a famous coalminers' strike in about 1910, in which (from memory) strikers were shot by police. It's a name everyone in the Welsh labour movement would know. Adam 05:45, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Although it's pronounced "Ton-ee-pan-dee" so the "Tony-Pandy" I presume you're thinking of doesn't quite work. Timrollpickering 17:20, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
"Tonnuh-pan-dee" – /tɒnə'pændi/ – in fact. -- Picapica (talk)

Homosexuality?[edit]

Was it "revealed" that Thomas was homosexual, or merely claimed that he was? Has there been any verification of this - at the relevant time - defamatory allegation?203.184.41.226 (talk) 02:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having lent Thomas £800 to pay blackmailers, Abse obviously thought it was a fact. I don't think Abse's claim has been corroborated. But I'm not sure it needs to be. It may have been "defamatory" once, even during Thomas's lifetime, but not any more. 20.133.0.13 (talk) 09:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Succession box - why?[edit]

What is the point of a succession box that does not illustrate a succession? What does it do if it does not list either predecessor or successor? And how does a senseless practice in other articles justify a senseless practice in this article? Other stuff exists, you know. Surtsicna (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not senseless practice. In the case of hereditary peerage succession is or has been always possible (at least in theory). Succession box for 1st and only peer illustrates that the peerage wasn't inherited. --Editor FIN (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Thomas, 1st Viscount Tonypandy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_Thomas,_1st_Viscount_Tonypandy&oldid=1209677246"