Talk:Lev Landau

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Picture[edit]

What happened to the much better picture which used to be in this article? It was replaced by an ugly prison mugshot. The old picture should be returned. --141.154.215.119 07:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where to find the old pic, but I agree completely, a photo from their labor camp tenure shouldn't be the main portrait of this accomplished scientist. Fulvius 11:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I added the new picture, but i'm not sure what I should select for copyright. Bronstein.jpg is the old picture, it should maybe be scaled down and put in the section on his imprisonment. Fulvius 12:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russian[edit]

Please do not call Russian everybody who was born in the Soviet Union or the Russian Empire! People can consider it as neglecting their true ethnic identity. It may offend people.

The word "Russian" may be misinterpreted by the reader. It is not clear what it means in this context: citizenship or ethmicity. The article contains information that L.D.Landau was born in the Russian Empire. So you do not loos any information removing "Russian" from the first sentence. Please do not revert. --AndriyK 12:51, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Please sign your posts by typing four tildas like this ~~~~
Please do not confuse ethnicity with relationship to a country. See the definition of Russian, particularly the last entry in the definition. If anyone would follow your logic, there would be no American people at all, because almost everyone there is an emmigrant. As for Landau, he was born in the Russian Empire, spoke Russian, lived in Moscow, died in Moscow, rests in Moscow. Looks like Russian applies to him. --Gene s 12:07, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Everybody knows what means "American". In contrast, "Russian" can be interpreted differently: It can mean "ethnic Russian". It can mean "citizen of Russia (after 1991)" It can mean "citizen of the Russian Empire (before 1917)". To avoid any confusion it should be clear from the context, or explained explicitely, what this word means in every particular case.

If you say: "Landau was Russian" and then you continue: "He was born in the Russian Empire", most of the readers would interpret this as "Landau was ethnic Russian and he was barn in the Russian Empire". So you text would be misunderstood. You should avoid such things in writing for the Wikipedia.

The Landau's relation to Russia is described quite clearly in the article. The word "Russian" in the firs sentence gives no additional information but can cause a confusion.

If you would like to add information about Landau's spoken language etc., you are free to do it. --AndriyK 12:51, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Well, you said Everybody knows what means "American". Please read American and see for yourself that you are wrong.
Yes, Landau relationship with Russia is described quite clearly in the article. So, the description "Russian" is correct. The google test also proves it: Russian 2,430 [1] vs. Soviet 422 [2]. I basically don't understand the nature of your objection. According to the definition at Russian the description of Landau as Russian is correct.
Please keep in mind that if you revert the article one more time, you will be in violation of the WP:3RR.
--Gene s 13:02, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You even did not try to think about avoiding the confusion and misinforming the reader. OK. I will seek for a comment from the comunity. --AndriyK 13:48, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

A brief summary of the discussion[edit]

I removed the word "Russian" from the first sentece of the article, because it can be misleading. A part of the readership can understand it in the present context as "ethnic Russian", which is incorrect. Landau was NOT an ethnic Russian.

Gene s insists on using the adjective Russian, because Landau was born in the Russian Empire and was a sitizen of this country during the first 9 years of his life. (The rest of his life he was a sitizen of Soviet Union, which is NOT the same as Russia.)

In my opinion, Landau's relation to Russia is described quite clearly in the article. The word "Russian" in the first sentence gives no additional information but can cause a confusion. From these reasons it should be removed.

General note:

  • In would suggest the wikipedia comunity to avoid using adjective "Russian" to all people who were born in the Soviet Union or the Russian Empire, uless they are (or were) ethnic Russians. At least, it should be clear from the context or explained explicitely, what the word "Russian" means: citizenship or ethnicity. Otherwise people can consider it as neglecting their actual ethnic identity and feel themselves offended. This is very much NOT in the spirit of the Wikipedia.

Well, the word "Russian" has been often used instead of "Soviet". But

  1. this is incorrect.
  2. this is offensive with respect to non-Russian ex-Soviets.

From the above reasons, Wikipedia should avoid this mixing.

I would be gratefull to the comunity for their comments on the issue. --AndriyK 13:48, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I would greately appreciate if you would not twist my words. If you want to make a summary of someone's statement, make it accurate. Don't misrepresent the words. Here is what I am saying:
Landau's relationship with Russia is quite clear from the article. Thus, the description of Landau as "Russian" in addition to other affiliations is correct. The google test also proves it: Russian 2,430 [3] vs. Soviet 422 [4].
Here is a great test for you. I am guessing from your name you are a Ukrainian. There is an article Igor Sikorsky. In the article he is described as Ukrainian. According to your logic he is not a Ukrainian, but rather a Pole or a Russian or an American. Could you please go there and remove the Ukrainian from the article?
As for a wiki-wide policy against the word "Russian" - good luck. --Gene s 14:07, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Dear Gene s, what is your goal? To make the article clear and to avoid misinterpretations, or start a political discussion? I do not support any policy against the word "Russian". I just would like to avoid misunderstanding and inaccurate statements. --AndriyK 14:27, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Yes, my intention is to make articles clear and informative. So far I am sticking with simple facts without starting a political discussion. "Russian" just like "Ukrainian", "Persian", "Chinese" does not necesserily mean ethnicity. It means a relationship with the country. It's a common rule here. --Gene s 15:01, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
But still it CAN mean ethnisity. How should the reader know, what you mean saying "Landau was Russian"? I perfectly understand what you mean. But what about the reader who have known nothing about Landau befor this article and who have not had a discussion with you on this issue? --AndriyK 15:48, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I didn't read all discussion, because I'm working on another topics now and I have a little time, sorry for that. For the same reason I'll not go into the discussion, I'll just indicate my point of view on this. Notice a little detail: a link Russian in the article points to the country:Russia, not the ethnicity - Russian, so, it's pretty clear, that it does not mean ethnicity. Landau's main contribution is to the science of the USSR and namely: Russian SFSR, because he worked in Moscow scientific institution most of his life. All Soviet institutions of the Russian SFSR changed their names to those of Russia in 1991-1992, so, Landau's scientific heritage belongs to Russia. It is pretty natural for me, when for example about Soviet scientists who worked most part of their lives in the institutions of Ukrainian SSR, being Russian by nationality, is written: Soviet/Ukrainian physicist, Russian by nationality, or with Russian roots, if nationality is not clear. So, if you know for sure, you may add, that Landau is Jewish by nationality and add him to the category Jewish people or something like that. But removing Russian and leaving only Soviet, without any indication of the country, to which his heritage belongs now, I think, is inappropriate. Cmapm 19:22, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

A few objections:
  • Not every reader will follow the link, so many of the readers will be wrongly informed about Landau's ethnicity
  • Heritage of scientiest in the field of mathematics, physics, biology etc. belong to the whole wold. This knowledge is international.
  • The information about Landau's connection to Russia and Russian science is described in the article. Does the word "Russian" in the first sentece contain additional information? Which one?
Do you want to misinforme the readers in the West about Landau's ethnicity? Why? --AndriyK 19:52, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • If you want readers to be informed in a "true way", change Russian to Russia's, but I suppose, that English-speaking people will change it back to Russian, as they change of the USSR to Soviet.
  • This is commonly applied to knowledge, but each scientist's works are also physically located in archives, laboratories, institutes etc., and they certainly belong to some country. Besides that, many big scientists leave a scientific school after them and it also resides in the institution, where they worked most part of their lives.
  • The first sentence about a scientist commonly point to the main country he/she contributed to and his/her nationality in each encyclopedia.
  • Do you think, that I and you (as I understand), readers in the East are misinformed, when in every article about US scientist first is written American, although ethnically he is, say, German or Hungarian? We just read the following couple of words or look for ethnicity item in the article.
Please, don't ask me provoking questions next time. I become involved into the discussion and go away from my main project. Cmapm 23:32, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

What is Landau ethnicity? Jewish or Azerbaijani, or both? I read the article. Not clear to me.67.113.3.167 06:26, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Jewish subethnicity of Russian etnicity of Soviet superethnicity. Russia is not a melting pot. --GS 02:58, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Landau loved russian poets... so he belonged to russian culture. He was one of the fathers-founders of Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, which supplies Russia and the whole world with the best physicists for the last 60 years! Note the institute of Landau's name of theoretical physics, which is located in Russia. The last but not least, Landau's course, (with the slagn name of "Landavshits") is fondly beloved among all generations of PhysTech students. So Landau surely belong to russian culture. ellol 12:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a very safe assumption that Landau, like ALL Soviet citizens, had an "internal passport" (внутренный пасспорт) and that passport would have had a field labeled "Nationality" to be understood in the sense of "ethnicity". If he were Jewish then in all likelihood his nationality would be entered there as "Evrei" (Jew.) In the Soviet Union, "Soviet" was a political concept but NOT an ethic concept although it had sort of a "ethnic subtext" as exemplified in the following частушка (chastushka, little bit of popular doggerel with a point to it) which I might have found in Ogonek years ago (could be wrong though): "Μы гордимся что Гагарин / Не еврей, не татарин / Не тунгус, не узбек / А наш СОВЕТСКИЙ человек " Very roughly it goes: We are proud that Gagarin / is not a Jew, is not a Tatar, is not Tungus, is not Uzbek, but is our Soviet countryman" which is actually a poor translation of something that is pretty much untranslatable but the point should be clear. Furthermore, among Soviets, "Russian" and "Jew" are VERY different. In the US, however, "Russian" is a name most often put on those whose native tongue is Russian. I have on MANY occasions asked people if they are Russian and have gotten the answer "Нет, я еврей" (No, I'm a Jew.) Vladimir Voinovich in the forward to one of his books recalls a person asking him how he, a Jew, could consider himself a RUSSIAN writer, to which he responds "I do not consider myself a Russian writer, I am a Russian writer" but his attitude seems to be not very widespread. (And to say "Jewish subethnicity of Russian etnicity" is wrong - one did not grow out of or give birth to the other, they are quite separate.) If Landau is a Jew then I think that the article should so state. To say that he is Soviet is, in a way, a meaningless statement, it only indicates the political structure under which he lived. Hi There 19:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HiThere is correct. I am adding that he was born into a Jewish family. This is consistent with other bios in WP. ←Humus sapiens ну? 20:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In English (and many other languages), Russian means either belonging to an ethnicity or to a country or both. Usages of the word in the Russian language itself are different, which is why AndriyK desired to change it. Russian wrt ethnicity is руский (ruskií), while the same word wrt country is российский (rossiískií) and in many other-language articles about him (including Russian), he is indisputably referred to as a Soviet physicist — because he lived in the respective epoch, was not Russian by ethnicity, was born in the part of the Russian Empire which is now Azerbaijan and spent most of his life as a scientist in Ukraine, while his scientific contributions benefited the Soviet Union.
How people are referred to in different languages as to who they were, when and where, is linguistically, culturally and traditionally different (and quite interesting, IMHO :). -Mardus 16:00, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy vio[edit]

I believe the biography section is cribbed straight from Landau, the Physicist and the Man (ISBN 0080363830). -- CYD

Which passages exactly and where do they correspond to what you refferred to? -Mardus 16:01, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additions[edit]

Biography between 1939 and 1962[edit]

Can anybody add some relevant information? TomyDuby (talk) 10:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stress in Landau[edit]

We say Ланда́у. Is this correct? The German original is stressed on the first syllable: LAN-dau. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 23:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did the Russians change it? -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 01:19, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting question, but I do not know the answer. As an initial guess based on Vasmer http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/vasmer/42376/%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%BE I would think that the name was seen as coming from French Landau rather than German Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obituary Source[edit]

Here is a photocopy of his obituary in The Times:

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Obits/Landau_Lev.html

It would be very worthwhile to add to the article some details which can be found in the obituary, and add the obituary to the references. It would be nice to get a more stable copy of the obit than this university webpage.

I original got the obit from this page:

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Landau_Lev.html

Njerseyguy (talk) 21:56, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jewish Background of Lev Landau[edit]

An anonymous deleted the text referring to Lev Landau's jewish background and claimed that the source in the text is the only source referring to his jewish background. However I find here, [ this here] and here also references to his Jewish background. See alse this book for his Jewish Azerbaijani background. I reverted the deletions. Please use this talk page if you like to discuss this. Thanks. Metzujan (talk) 11:08, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

and is there not jewish sources for that? And I can't agree these web-site to be reliable sources. I'm from Kharkiv, Ukraine, know a lot about this person, and there is no mentions that he was a jew. The fact he has surname that can be Jewish can't be enough to call him a jew, 'cos he wasn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.12.216.214 (talk) 11:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks for your reaction. The third link is a book, and I agree that websites are not everything, but you seem to deny his family background. Why? As you know a lot about him, do you know the names of his parents? And do you know who his great grandfather was? Metzujan (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lubov and David. btw strange that is not mention in the article. Maybe his great grandfather was a jew, so what? I know for sure that he has straight line of Russians, also he had Ukrainian root. If someone has one of his distant relatives jew it doesn't make his a jew, the same for all other nation. He claimed himself as a Russian, all of his environment also did that. I can't understand why nowadays jews try to attach to their nation all prominent people that theoretically can had some jew some generation before. Why if between 8 great grandparent one was a jew a man are claimed jew, even if 5-6 other great grandparents where of the same nationality and not jew?
Well if your parents are Jewish, even if you don't practise Judaism you stay Jewish, unlike other religions where its not lineage but a personal choise. It's not a far distinct connection to Judaism, but a direct connection. Btw, his grandfather was a famous rabbi. Metzujan (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
only one of his parents has a chance to be a jew
I'm sorry to disappoint you, both of his parents were Jewish, and he also mentioned this himself. See also this link, where he has been quoted that the KGB must have been aware that his Jewish parents fled to the USA. Metzujan (talk) 11:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have really big doubts about this. Why there is absolutely no information that he is Jew in Russian or Ukrainian languages? And from sources from Russia or Ukraine? That is very looks like fake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.12.216.214 (talk) 10:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In the former USSR, "Jew" was a nationality or ethnicity by law, according to Who is a Jew. But anyway, just that he is born from Jewish parents, without any other mentioning of his self identification as a Jew, I think it is pretty wild to list him in all those Jewish scientist categories.

Hendrik Casimir, a physicist who met Landau in Copenhagen, recalls him as an ardent communist, very proud of his revolutionary roots. The enthusiasm with which Landau went about building Soviet science was part of his socialistic fervor. In 1935 he published an odd piece entitled “Bourgeoisie and Contemporary Physics” in the Soviet newspaper Izvestia. Apart from attacking bourgeois inclinations toward religious superstition and the power of money he praised the “unprecedented opportunities for the development of physics in our country, provided by the Party and the government.”

yet his is not in Category:Soviet physicists... -- 12:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honorsteem (talk • contribs)
This is ridiculous. Should we start putting "born to Christian parents" or "born to latino parents" in every single article on wikipedia? This information adds absolutely nothing to the article other than purposeful confusion. If you want to add information about Lev Landau's grandfather and how he may have been a Jew, then by all means create an article for him specifically. But this type of behavior is only turning perfectly good articles into questionable ones. I will remove the mentions of this from the article. Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 19:30, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He specifically self-identifies himself with, and speaks as a representative of, the Soviet Jewish community, in the New York Times. Both his parents were Jewish. It's also mentioned in every major biography of him. Biographical articles usually describe the religious and ethnic identity of their subjects. The information is staying. That is all. Avaya1 (talk) 19:20, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per Avaya1. Stating background facts, is what we do all the time. Not any different here. Metzujan (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Landau's List: don't be coy[edit]

Please somebody track down and reproduce here the List.

"Landau kept a list of names of physicists which he ranked on a logarithmic scale of productivity ranging from 0 to 5" is allusive but not useful.

Name names! Assign numbers!

http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.3558 cites in footnote 7 as a source for Landau's List:

A. Livanova, Landau (Znanie, Moskva, 1983); in Russian. Available online here: http://sgtnd.narod.ru/wts/rus/Landau.htm ; There is an English translation (A. Livanova, Landau, a great physicist and teacher (Pergamon, Oxford, 1980)) of the previous edition of the book, but this does not mention the first classification used by Landau in 1930s.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lev Landau. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dates of Stalin Prize[edit]

The text of the article states: "For this work Landau received the Stalin Prize in 1949 and 1953"

But the INFOBOX says: "Stalin Prize (1946)"

Can someone sort out the discrepancy? I see that there is a citation but it's behind a pay wall so I can't look at it and fix it myself.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Landau[edit]

One of the leading physicist in USSR is described as Azerbaijani? Just because he went to school there? It’s laughable to say the least. He was a Russian Jew. There are numerous books written about him, some by his colleagues (Khalatnikov for one) : nowhere you find anything suggesting this outlandish claim. Any physicist from USSR can attest to it: he was a guru for many of them. 172.251.75.67 (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@85.146.82.10: Indeed. And now to reply to the IP thats literally trying to do that; I'm sorry I didn't see any "argument". You said 1) Baku was Russian Empire and Azerbaijan didn't exist (countries, nations don't evaporate into thin air when they're colonized), 2) You claimed that this is somehow Armenia-Azerbaijan issue (what are you even talking about?) 3) You reduced national identity to the number of years something was called something (again, what are you even talking about? If your claim is Azerbaijan didn't exist, I refer you to a thing called history
It seems you should yourself try this thing called "history" first;
  • "Russian sources cited in this study refer to the Turkish-speaking Muslims (Shi’a and Sunni) as “Tatars” or, when coupled with the Kurds (except the Yezidis), as “Muslims.” The vast majority of the Muslim population of the province was Shi’a. Unlike the Armenians and Georgians, the Tatars did not have their own alphabet and used the Arabo-Persian script. After 1918, and especially during the Soviet era, this group identified itself as Azerbaijani." -- Bournoutian, George (2018). Armenia and Imperial Decline: The Yerevan Province, 1900-1914"'. Routledge. p. 35 (note 25).
  • "The third major nation in South Caucasia,19 the Azerbaijanis, hardly existed as an ethnic group, let alone a nation, before the twentieth century. The inhabitants of the territory now occupied by Azerbaijan defined themselves as Muslims, members of the Muslim umma; or as Turks, members of a language group spread over a vast area of Central Asia; or as Persians (the founder of Azerbaijani literature, Mirza Fath’ Ali Akhundzadä, described himself as ‘almost Persian’). ‘Azerbaijani identity remained fluid and hybrid’ comments R. G. Suny (1999–2000: 160). As late as 1900, the Azerbaijanis remained divided into six tribal groups – the Airumy, Karapapakh, Pavlari, Shakhsereny, Karadagtsy and Afshavy. The key period of the formation of the Azerbaijani nation lies between the 1905 revolution and the establishment of the independent People’s Republic of Azerbaijan in 1918 (Altstadt, 1992: 95)." -- Ben Fowkes (2002). Ethnicity and Conflict in the Post-Communist World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 14
  • "As hinted earlier, the history of Azerbaijan and of the growth of an Azerbaijani ethnie is more problematic than the other two cases. The lack of a clear way of differentiating between the various Turkic languages spoken and written in medieval and early modern times is one of the difficulties. Another is the absence until the twentieth century of an Azerbaijani state." -- idem, p. 35
  • "In the case of the third major ethnic group of South Caucasus, the Azerbaijanis, the path towards nationhood was strewn with obstacles. First, there was uncertainty about Azerbaijani ethnic identity, which was a result of the influence of Azerbaijan’s many and varied pre-Russian conquerors, starting with the Arabs in the mid-seventh century and continuing with the Saljuq Turks, the Mongols, the Ottoman Turks and the Iranians. Hence the relatively small local intelligentsia wavered between Iranian, Ottoman, Islamic, and pan-Turkic orientations. Only a minority supported a specifically Azerbaijani identity, as advocated most prominently by Färidun bäy Köchärli." -- idem, p. 68
  • "Azerbaijani national identity emerged in post-Persian Russian-ruled East Caucasia at the end of the nineteenth century, and was finally forged during the early Soviet period." -- Gasimov, Zaur (2022). "Observing Iran from Baku: Iranian Studies in Soviet and Post-Soviet Azerbaijan". Iranian Studies. 55 (1): 37
Lev Landau's parents were not even from Baku (which had a heavily mixed population), but Mogilev, in present-day Belarus. If you can't demonstrate that the majority of WP:RS calls Lev Landau "Soviet-Azerbaijani", then I will revert you per WP:CONSENSUS and WP:ONUS. And if you revert again after that, you will be reported for MOS:ETHNICITY (which you technically didn't even violate since he was not even ethnic Azeri) and WP:TENDENTIOUS violations. --HistoryofIran (talk) 22:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@85.146.82.10: Three days have passed. Are you going to address this? This time you even altered sourced info [5]. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you are seriously expecting an Azerbaijani person with Turkish-Talysh background who lived in Azerbaijan for 17 years (just like Landau) and then moved out of it to get better education (just like Landau) and pursue science (just like Landau) and then better life standards (just like Landau's parents) to accept that not only Landua is not Soviet-Azerbaijani physicist, but that I am not an Azerbaijani and that we don't actually exist and that we didn't exist until 1991, I have bad news for you. 85.146.82.10 (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@85.146.82.10: Please stop wasting my time (see WP:FORUM), are you planning on addressing the sources and demonstrating that WP:RS calls Lev Landau "Soviet-Azerbaijani"? If not, then I will revert it back to the original revision. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:14, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article locked for editing[edit]

After unsuccessfully fighting the Russian chauvinism and Western stupidity that calls everyone from the USSR as “Russian”, I see that the current version settled on supposedly more neutral “Soviet” as a descriptor. In that case at least the following individuals should be upgraded to the neutral descriptors: Nikoloz Mushelishvili, Viktor Ambartsumian. They are currently listed as Soviet Georgian and a Soviet Armenian. Since we agreed that no other peoples other than Russians existed until 1991, these individuals who were born in Russian Empire and were Soviet citizens, should also be called Soviet scientists. The truth warriors of Wikipedia, I expect you to make the necessary changes and lock those articles as well to make sure the lowly non-Russians don’t change your opinions. Thank you. 85.51.226.249 (talk) 16:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Start a discussion on the respective article talk pages instead of leaving unhelpful comments here. Mellk (talk) 16:46, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The reason why I have left it here is because it’s relevant here, thank you for your helpful comment. I’m not in the business of denying people their cultural identity, those who are, need to make those changes wherever necessary. 85.51.226.249 (talk) 15:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your rants and strawmans are not relevant here. See WP:SOAPBOX and WP:FORUM. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Funny how Wikipedia boosts one’s sense of self-importance. Let me guess, you have three references from an Armenian dude, an Iranian studies journal and some random Ben Fowkes quote that doesn’t even agree with your point. Brilliant scholarship, let me get you some medal. 85.51.226.249 (talk) 09:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You’re right, lets stop using academic sources by well-educated authors, lets quote your brilliant and totally not pseudo-history words instead. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear History of Iran, as a supposedly Armenian-Iranian person I understand you have been fed on a particular diet of ethnic hatred, I was too, that’s just how it works in our geography, unfortunately. However maybe one lesson you could take from all this, is that showing sources that don’t even support your claims is not in itself an act of scholarship, it’s an act of throwing references at the other person. I wish you all the best in the rest of your life and hope you grow out of your prejudices. 85.51.226.249 (talk) 14:10, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Lie about me and the sources as much as you want, I couldnt care less. I’m content with knowing that your disruptive edits will never go through this article again. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Landau in popular culture[edit]

In a role-playing gacha video game Honkai: Star Rail developed and published in 2023 by miHoYo, characters Serval, Gepard and Lynx all share the surname Landau in reference to the physicist Lev Landau. 2.92.154.128 (talk) 01:16, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2024[edit]

Remove, please, the name of Satyendra Nath Bose from the Landau ranking of physicists. Landau never included S. N. Bose in his rankings. Bose does not belong to the Bohr-HeisenbergDirac-Schrodinger club.

See numerous rememberances of Landau. Bose's name dos not appear in any of them! 2A06:C701:72A6:B300:5CDB:E62A:C803:6245 (talk) 11:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. M.Bitton (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lev_Landau&oldid=1212553665"