Talk:Eagle, Alaska

Alaska Mid‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Related‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Related	This article has been rated as Related-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

Perhaps there should be a mention of the fact that this tiny hamlet has no less than five places of worship, including a temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints... Also the Queen two should be mentioned, along with the rest of Holland America's business. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.25.100.46 (talk) 18:10, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

||Ice Dam?|| The Wikipedia page on Ice Dams shows Eagle in a flood of ice and water (2009?) This sounds like an important part of the town's recent history. Perhaps someone familiar with the event could include it in the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KBurchfiel (talk • contribs) 19:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal: Merge Eagle, Alaska, Eagle Historic District and Fort Egbert[edit]

Partial support of merge: I'm definitely in favor of merging Eagle Historic District into Eagle, as they're the same place.

I'm not sure about merging Fort Egbert, as it's a separate entity. For instance, Fort Lowell and Tucson, Arizona are separate articles -- even though Ft. Lowell is now well within metro Tucson. Is there a general policy or custom for this situation? --Pete Tillman (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merger of Fort Egbert, as it is Wikipedian custom to have separate articles for defunct forts located adjacent to small towns and villages - Fort Mackinac, Fort de Buade, and Fort Wilkins Historic State Park are examples from northern Michigan. Eagle Historic District could be merged unless there is significant population activity in present-date Eagle outside the historic district, which is doubtful. Bigturtle (talk) 02:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed these merge tags on the grounds that the merge proposer didn't initiate a discussion – then I noticed that somebody else did. I've returned the tag to Eagle Historic District, but it looks like there's a consensus against merging Fort Egbert (I'm also against it), so I won't add the merge tag back to that article. If that's alright with everyone. DoctorKubla (talk) 07:07, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Eagle, Alaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]