Talk:Carceral archipelago

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2003 comments[edit]

Mav, can you explain why you have made this cut? It seemed ly useful (although not well-written) information) Slrubenstein

The edits in question were made by 142.177 who is banned from the Wikipedia. See [1] for more details. The Anome

I think it should be edited probably. But, the article is good. Who could edit it ? Can you do it The Anome ? Or can Slrubenstein edit it ? John Stewart

Ho, I had not seen someone put a comment. Yes, it should be edited probably, but it is interesting I think. Maybe someone will be better than me for that.John Stewart

Neutrality[edit]

This describes a political theory as a neutral fact. Needs serious rewriting. Goldfritha (talk) 01:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It needs some simple rewriting. forestPIG(grunt) 20:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the simple addition of the phrase "the theory of" or "the notion of" appended before the term "carceral state" might obviate nearly all perception of this article being non-neutral, as it is. It seems merely a case of poor writing, rather than the author meaning to write a polemic piece. Too many of these and too many things on my plate, but it is a simple edit for someone who has a half-hour to spare.Googlyelmo (talk) 11:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We agree on the writing quality. And yes, a few bright candies too. To me the only consequential question is; is it clearly explaining reality? To me, no it is not. Language in this context should be clear, focused, and invisible, not wandering and distracting. At first glance it looks like half belongs on the editor's floor. ....and a lot longer than 1/2 hour. OK. "If I'm not learning on-topic stuff, then the article is failing, cut it." Does that sound something like a consensus attitude for editing the article??
To me it looks more like a pile of lumber than a building. It's been 9 years. Is it even worth trying to fix?
--2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:F0AD:6D5A:2B1E:3552 (talk) 23:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)--Just Asking[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carceral archipelago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Carceral archipelago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]