Talk:Dream, After Dream

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Dreamafterdream.jpg[edit]

Image:Dreamafterdream.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Dreamafterdream.jpg[edit]

Image:Dreamafterdream.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking as someone with an allergic reaction to a certain someone's voice...[edit]

Having just listened to this for the first time, the two tracks mentioned as having "sparse" vocals certainly contain enough to make me wonder why they're any different from the supposedly "true" one mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.230.41 (talk) 01:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You dislike Perry... well done. Total nothing post. And by the way: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/100-greatest-singers-of-all-time-19691231/steve-perry-19691231. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.5.94.52 (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

like him or hate him, u gotta admit that only little girl is really a "song" to speak of. i'd suggest reverting to however it was worded before -- 3 songs with "full vocals" is definitely not how i'd describe this; more like "1 song with real vocals and 2 more with some oohs and aahs". 209.172.25.189 (talk) 08:21, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]