User talk:192.197.71.189

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 192.197.71.189, is registered to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

2004[edit]

Just a note clarifying the goatse.cx vandalism of the main page on 11/16/04. It has been confirmed via developer access to the Squid logs that this anon was indeed NOT responsible. A different IP address used a User name that was identical to this IP address. This IP address should be considered blameless. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 21:39, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

Yay! I can play in the sandbox again!! 192.197.71.189 21:44, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

bleah :-P

Please stop filling the sandbox. It becomes unusable for others. Fredrik | talk 17:57, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

2005[edit]

I saw your comments on the Oak Island article and replaced them with a NPOV tag. Can you pop over to the Oak Island talk page and elaborate on what can be done to improve the article? --NormanEinstein 18:12, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a problem with the Oak Island article please drop by the talk page and elaborate on your position so we can all work together to improve it. In your edits you've said that dissenting opinions and opposing viewpoints are delelted, but you've made no attempt (at least recently) to add anything constructive to the article. I'm not even sure if you think the article slants too much toward stating the treasure as fact or legend. We're willing to listen to your issues with the article if you'd let us. --NormanEinstein 17:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I concur with NormanEinstein. Please tell us on the Oak Island talk page what bothers you about the article. I would like to hear your point of view. --JonathanFreed 05:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Could you please stop adding your personal disclaimer that you don't agree with the Oak Island article? We've invited you to express your opinions and help to improve the article, but your repeated additions border on vandalism. If you continue this activity you might be banned. --NormanEinstein 18:13, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours for readding the non-specific note to the top of the Oak Island article, and not using the talk page to detail any problems. Thue | talk 19:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If you wish to dispute the contents of an article, please tag it as NPOV using Template:TotallyDisputed and discuss it on the talk page. You complaints will not be taken seriously unless you participate in the discussion. -Loren 18:56, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in mind that Wikipedia operates by consensus. If you want an article to improve, you need to collaborate in consensus-building activities. You may argue that the current Oak Island article is factually wrong, or factually correct but presented in a biased way, or both. However, if you don't provide actionable information ("X is incorrect, the correct information is Y", or "I think that saying Z is biased"), it's unreasonable to expect the article to improve (or change at all). Repeatedly inserting a notice at the top of the article is inappropriate: you can insert an appropriate template message (e.g. {{NPOV}}), but then be prepared to state your objection on the article's talk page and to work with other editors on an improved version. If you don't make specific suggestions, someone will likely remove the notice and consider the matter closed. Thanks, and happy editing, --MarkSweep 20:05, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You've added the same disclaimer to Oak Island article every work day for two weeks in a row. Isn't there something at Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada that you could be working on instead of vandalising Wikipedia? --NormanEinstein 16:17, August 19, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ccwaters 20:24, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

2006[edit]

Please do not remove Afd notices from articles while the discussion is in progress. --Ezeu 23:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages-- it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. Shell ^babelfish 17:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you are User:Paddles, please login before continuing to edit this userspace. Thank you! DG X 18:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This person is not me. If you are going to try and have an article deleted for vanity, then (a) be a bit more careful about following the instructions and (b) remember the "vanity" rule applies to articles in the main WP space, not in the User: space. I have never claimed enough notability to have an article in the main article space. Paddles ^T_C 02:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 4:21. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 18:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to 4:21, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tuspm ^{Talk | Contribs | E-Mail Me} 18:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do not put nonsense to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Kaworu Nagisa. It is considered vandalism, and you may be blocked at further attempts. (Wikimachine 01:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Your recent edit to Compaq Presario (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2007[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lucas Bryant, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 01:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you did at User:Keith Ranville. Wikipedia isn't a messageboard and editing another editor's userpage without their permission is at best impolite and at worst vandalism.--Isotope23 15:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your post appears to violate WP:LEGAL as well. Don't make legal threats; that is a blockable offense.--Isotope23 15:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with links to piano-keyboard-reviews.com (*|search current). Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. Since Wikipedia uses Nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Femto 15:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Image:Ornamental.jpg, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Edokter (Talk) 19:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with GurIqbal Chahal. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. --Evb-wiki 19:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)GurIqbal Chahal[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Todd Skinner, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I'm not sure what you meant by "kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk" but I doubt it was important =) EricTJ 19:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gardasil. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Gscshoyru 11:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Gardasil and Patrick Sweeney (ice hockey), you will be blocked from editing. • Maurog • 12:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gardasil, you will be blocked from editing. Gscshoyru 13:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.—DerHexer (Talk) 13:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Culture of Costa Rica (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2008[edit]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Port Dalhousie, Ontario has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Canadian Food Inspection Agency has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 ^(t-c) 23:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gneiss, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geologyguy (talk) 19:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Super Bowl champions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 03:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made in Richard Doll. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (192.197.71.189) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Old Moonraker (talk) 20:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Simon Whitfield has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Simon Whitfield constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Todd Bertuzzi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Reso lute 20:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ryan Cabrera has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Newspaper of record has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Corruptcopper (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Glen Johnson (English footballer), you will be blocked from editing. Malinaccier (talk) 01:29, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

192, thanks for the cleanup work on the Martin Brodeur article. The "2007-present" section was getting a bit cumbersome, and repetitive with the records section. I planned to clean it up myself, but never got around to it. I like your approach. Thanks! (Note to other editors: There are valuable, constructive edits from this shared IP. Please be mindful of this when fighting vandalism.) Me Three (talk to me) 17:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page List of holidays by country has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chatroulette, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chatroulette was changed by 192.197.71.189 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-16T17:29:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Railroad Tycoon II worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. -- Jack?! 19:45, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Man v. Food. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Stickee (talk) 13:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Art of Living Foundation, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DMacks (talk) 15:24, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Malcolm Lowry has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 15:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Malcolm Lowry constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content without explanation. Thank you. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 15:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Egg salad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –BMRR (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egg salad, you may be blocked from editing. –BMRR (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flounder, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. West.andrew.g (talk) 06:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fishing lure with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Weedwhacker128 (talk) 18:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:50, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Magioladitis. An edit that you recently made to Naya Lahore seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Edmonton. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Terms such as “large-scale”, “high-quality”, “larger”, “scenic”, “juggernaut”, “major”, “minor”, “medium”, “jam packed” etc. are opinion-based, are not neutral and/or are subjective, some of which can be construed as being promotional in nature. Thank you. Hwy43 (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I disagree with you on some of these words. While I admit some of them could seem opinionated, others simply are descriptive. For example, it is useful for a reader to know that The Fringe Festival in Edmonton is a major festival, while the dragon boat festival is relatively less large. This is not adding opinion but rather depth.

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Fraggle81. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Desai because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Fraggle81 (talk) 19:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. An edit that you recently made to JavaScript seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Marshall McLuhan. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Zhao (surname) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. A m i t 웃 18:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Food Structure Journal 1982-1993 was accepted[edit]

Food Structure Journal 1982-1993, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

--Mdann52talk to me! 15:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2013 Stanley Cup playoffs seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Mononomic. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Belnan, Nova Scotia that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Mono·nomic 18:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 30 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Robert Marland page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vapor-compression refrigeration, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Canadian Food Inspection Agency may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The [[Minister of Health(Canada)]is responsible for the CFIA and is responsible for establishing

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of strawberry cultivars may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| NY1123 ‘Senga Sengana’ × ‘Midland’) × Holiday
location=Ottawa|isbn=0-660-62338-2|pages=551|url=khanizadeh.info/book|coauthors=Khanizadeh...], Agri-Food Canada. Ed.: Shahrokh}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 7 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the List of strawberry cultivars page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cellulose, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plantsurfer (talk) 14:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rachel McAdams without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 21:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Oxidative phosphorylation ‎ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrow (season 5) has been accepted[edit]

Arrow (season 5), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 23:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nowruz, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Home Lander. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Nowruz— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Bandits of the Acoustic Revolution— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Akwesasne— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Ts12rAc. Your recent edit to Tennis at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's singles appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Rubber duck, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.