Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Sullivan

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was no vote. - Mailer Diablo 07:34, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Craig_Sullivan

seems like a vanity page for a losing candidate; created before his party primary, which he lost. Updated once since. Per discussion on politician entries, this guy doesn't seem like he merits his own entry. Feco 06:28, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: "Craig Sullivan" gets 916 google web hits, but many seem not related to subject of article. "Craig Sullivan" Washington -Wikipedia gets 671 hits, most (but not all) of the top ones seem about article subject. Wikipedia article is an orphan. If he is a notable state political figure, the article needs to do a better job of explaining this. -- Infrogmation 19:27, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• considering his lost in his party primary, I don't think he qualifies... as near as I can tell, he's never held an elected office. Feco 22:23, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.