Talk:Geology of the Zion and Kolob canyons area

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleGeology of the Zion and Kolob canyons area is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 6, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 12, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
September 10, 2008Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article

older comments[edit]

Featured, with nary a conversation topic on its talk page... remarkable. This has to be one of the faster-track features in a while :-)

Most of the FAs I've written almost all by myself are like that. --mav

Both "Zion" and "Kolob" derive from Latter-day Saint beliefs. Because there is apparently no article on the canyons themselves, is it appropriate to note the etymology here? Cool Hand Luke 17:10, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I think that would be more appropriate for the main Zion National Park article (which does do that, in fact). --mav 12:12, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

a few stratigraphic edits...[edit]

edited for time-rock unit problems (rocks/formations = Upper, Lower; time = Early, Late) and other minor geologic time and stratigraphic nomenclature errors...also a few paleoenvironmental changes for the Triassic units based on my own work -- Tim Demko

Cool - thanks! --mav 23:32, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Tallest sandstone cliffs in the world?[edit]

It is stated here that "The monoliths in the sides of Zion Canyon are believed to have the tallest sandstone cliffs in the world.", the sandstone cliffs found in the Guiana Highlands, specially in Venezuela, are much higher, with the main wall of Angell Falls raising above 3,000 feet. I have edited the above sentence accordingly.

Dycotiles, 30th Nov 2005

Kaibab Limestone[edit]

This article indicates the age of the Kaibab Limestone is 240 million years old, then in the next section 260 million years old. The article on Grand Canyon says 230 million. Anyone care to clarify? Zencowboy27 (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The ages of formations are a common area of dispute among geologists and different contemporaneous sources use somewhat different figures. Trouble comes when sources penned in widely-separated decades are used in the same article since new studies refine the figures over time. I removed the first mention of the age b/c it is from an older primary source and redundant anyway. As for the Grand Canyon; that is is a different area and thus has a different age profile (the Kaibab Sea grew and shrank over a period of millions of years covering a large area). I'll take a look at my more current books on the subject to make sure both articles are up-to-date. --mav (reviews needed) 01:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geology of the Zion and Kolob canyons area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]