Talk:QWERTY

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

False precision?[edit]

The article's History section currently has this:

The modern layout is:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - =
Q W E R T Y U I O P [ ] \
A S D F G H J K L ; '
Z X C V B N M , . /

I'm not sure it is wise to include all that punctuation there, because that's highly specific to the US-QWERTY layout and ANSI keyboard design, and the \ in particular is not found in that position e.g. on (UK and similar) ISO QWERTY keyboards. Perhaps that part of the article would be better served by a common denominator layout subset of all (globally) widely available QWERTY keyboards. —ReadOnlyAccount (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this seems relevant
50.245.17.105 (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That paper is already cited seven times in the article, as footnote [2]. But ReadOnlyAccount's question is about "the modern layout", which well outside its scope.
But the caption should have said which of the many modern layouts, so I have just now corrected it. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Qwertqwert has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § Qwertqwert until a consensus is reached. 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ please edit my user page! Talk 17:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Qazwsxedcrfvtgbyhnujmikolp until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 16:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]