User talk:Eddie Dealtry

Welcome to Eddie's talk page

If you find my work off the mark, please edit it and be bold.

Sandbox

Hi. Please don't remove the template from the sandbox. It's important for newbies that it is left there. Thank you. --Stormwolf 22:17, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

Apologies - in future I'll put the template back. Some one left a "do not edit out of service" on the page and I just wiped the lot.--Eddie 22:25, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

No problem, I know how that can be. Just wanted to make sure you were awares. I hope I didn't sound rude or anything.--Stormwolf 22:27, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

Okay by me. I won't forget to put that template back though! --Eddie 22:30, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Fell running

I woinder if we ought to leave a link on cross country via hills or hill running to fell running for the benefit of those who use the other terms??

Linuxlad 21:16, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Well spotted - done just for fell running. BTW If you'd like to watch over, I intend to flesh out Fell Running in a few days with a few more words and sections - maybe stick Mountain Running on its own page. Eddie 11:36, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

BGR

I've done a Bob Graham Round article - not yet fully linked in. Linuxlad 11:27, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

BGR - the figures I give (72miles + 28,000ft) are those on the title page of the BGR site (see link). I must confess the 61 miles + 21,000 ft figures you quote sound more like ones I heard quoted when my mate did it a few years back. The Fell & Rock site I linked to also gives 72 miles. I have the Pete Bland book somewhere...

Linuxlad 22:24, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

And there's that inscription on Bob Graham's stone with some fantacstic numbers. We'll have to measure the route - which I'll do. Eddie 10:14, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Not sure I could run it all (or indeed any of it) these days :-) By the way we've acquired a big blue 'cleanup ' tag on BGR - and no feedback on why - not pleased Linuxlad 20:10, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I've had a first go at a tidy - will look again later today.

The link to Dr Barbara Moore is Harry Griffin's article surely. Griffin, who wrote in t'Grauniad as their 'Lakes' diarist, poured gentle scorn on Moore's walk (John o Groats to Lands End IIRC), saying you didn't have to be that fit to do it, you could even get fit on the way south - but that Bob Graham had set a real record no-one had touched for 25 years. (It's in the BGR book - when I rediscover it, as is a list of the Lakes 24 hours record since about 1870 I recollect).

Linuxlad 08:49, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

60s mindset & BGR - it was the end of post-war austerity, and about the time people started getting unfit if they weren't health freaks. Kennedy's challenge to walk 50 miles and (for squadies) carry 50 pounds , was about then. People started walking London to Brighton for fun, and within a few years young scouts (my contemporaries) were doing the 4 Inns walk solo in the Northern Peak District at Easter and not all living to tell the tale.

Where's your croft? (I'm jealous!) Linuxlad 11:35, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I've done a Harry Griffin stub - but I think the article in question on Barbara Moore may have been written for the Lancashire Evening Post. Linuxlad 20:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Good idea Linuxlad. Wikipedia could do with a page on HG. I'm beginning to regret resurrecting Dr Bardara Moore. It's a bit of a personal theory that the likes of her were part of a revival of long distance epics. But as you said, the move had been going on for a decade or so and in a number of geographical areas. --Eddie | Talk 09:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Hill Running

Hi Eddie, I'm the enthusiaist who added the edits to the hill running page in May. I had not revisited it till today. I see you have apparently removed some voicing changes etc. I dont have a problem with this I was very keen to ensure that the passion that grabs lots of us reached the article. Can we have a chat about how we can do this within the guidelines?

The one bit that seems to be missing from what I wanted to put in is that there are still some races going on that capture the more traditional spirit of village sports and that people should try them before they disappear.

So I would be grateful if you could help a newbie maintain the standards and bring my real world experience to Wikipedia.

Dick Wall.

Hi Dick

You get on and improve Fell Running. If I remember, there were some comments on the talk page about your addition being a touch POV (Y'er own Point of View). If that was you, and you agree, I'd just say that the idea is to make an article as neutral as pos - like an encyclopedia - but it's a bit of a grey area.

The more traditional races sound a great idea to me. Currently, I'm of the opinion that Mountain Running could do with separating being more international.

My angle on Fell Running was to work it up a bit with a decent structure and try and protect the organisers. A user has since improved the warning. What about inserting that "Feet in the Clouds" warning - to go to the Gym or stay at home and watch the tele? (joke).

If you do set about Fell Running, you may want to call for opinions on the Fell Running Discussion Page.

Eddie

Coordinates and Euclid

see Talk:Euclidean space.

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eddie Dealtry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eddie Dealtry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)