Talk:Oligarchy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oligarchy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Discrepancies[edit]

The sentance, "Oligarchy is a form of government where most political power effectively rests with a small segment of society (typically the most powerful, whether by wealth, military strength, ruthlessness, or political influence)," is bordering on tautology. Dustin Asby 10:54, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

lamens terms[edit]

What does it mean???

You probably mean "layman's terms", although your version might soon be adopted by hack3rz. A layman, technically, is a person who is not a cleric (an employee of the church). More generally, it is a person who does not have specialist knowledge of the subject under discussion. "Layman's terms" are therefore words that a non-specialist can understand. --Heron 16:26, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

No question: the bit about "wealth" puts the USA squarely into this slot: OLIGARCHY. So how can their politicians pretend to "bring democracy to the rest of the world" !? hpbo 17:12, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Dubious claim in Overview[edit]

"for which another term commonly used today is plutocracy."

This is OR.

"One of the first oligarchies in history is that of Sparta, which developed the concept alongside its rival Athens, and essentially provided a counterpoint to Athenian democracy."

I am going to remove this. No sources given. Violates WP:NOR. A better wording should be "Greek author X said that Sparta is..." or "Historian X said that blah blah blah". Neko Cherise Sapphire Star (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

History of oligarchies[edit]

I think there really should be a "History" section, covering the origins of Oligarchies in classical Greece, and explaining how the concept evolved up to modern day oligarchies. It's mentioned in the article that Aristotle coined the term, perhaps that can be used as a start. Combustible Vulpex (talk) 06:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Canada Under Capitalism?[edit]

Seems this section was jammed into a section with the only source referring to tropical African oligarchies. I'm unsure to if there is more evidence to this beyond personal bias. 69.66.33.215 (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Career Choicd Made Easy[edit]

Scince this is not a monotheistic topic, I'm so sure that the only decision to leave behind assets are only durring and directly right after divorce. When court is held, only those permissive few retain from arms the legallity of spoken decissions; not choices left ahead. If for at any reason attributing careers make a difference in people's salary I get often. Don't be let down just because this doesn't allow for comic book type of relief, such as how to dress or where to go. Every time the issue of archology is mentioned, some born lucky and some born poor get throttled like a baby during and just right before a baby shower. So: I CAN SEE WHERE YOU ARE COMING FROM. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6011:C8F0:45F0:DF6A:93D3:8DED:D19 (talk) 03:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]