Talk:Michel Ney

Posttraumatic stress syndrome

• I have at home a book about battlefield archaeology including about the Battle of Waterloo, that theorizes that Ney's unwise tactics at Waterloo were because he was unfit to command because of severe posttraumatic stress syndrome as a result of his ordeal in the retreat from Moscow. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Waterloo Campaign

This article is much better to read. Someone please clean up Waterloo Campaign Article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.208.241.120 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michel Ney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216071449/http://gaslight.mtroyal.ab.ca/waterloo.htm to http://gaslight.mtroyal.ab.ca/waterloo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The Peter Stuart Ney case

The French version has a section about Peter Stuart Ney. Should this as well?

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_Ney#L'affaire_Peter_Stuart_Ney

2602:306:CFEA:170:FC45:5337:4F24:5915 (talk) 03:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

No, it's totally WP:UNDUE. It's an amateur theory at best, not something real historians believe. Harizotoh9 (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Launchballer talk 15:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Michel Ney

• ... that Michel Ney allowed himself to be tried for treason because "he was French and will remain French"?
  • Reviewed:

Created by Ilikefeeshlol1234321 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:25, 27 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Michel Ney; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

• welcome to dyk, Ilikefeeshlol1234321! i am not sure if you are already aware, but this project focuses on showcasing new articles and recently improved articles, as explained at wp:dyk. the guidelines at wp:dyknew explain that a nominated article should have been, within the last seven days, either created in article space, expanded at least fivefold, or promoted to good article status.
  unfortunately, this article does not appear to currently be eligible for an appearance at dyk, as it was first created in 2003, and was last edited more than two weeks ago. i do not believe it is feasible to expand the article fivefold, considering the current length of the article, though if you think you can successfully nominate it for good article status, that may be a way to feature this article at dyk in the future.
  apologies for being the bearer of bad news. if you have any questions about the dyk process, please let me know. dying (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)