Talk:List of people in Playboy 2000–2009

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Crystal McCahill[edit]

Can somebody help me with the Crystal McCahill link in the 2009 table. For some reason, I can't get that link to work. Hoang.pham19 (talk) 23:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Table format[edit]

Say! The table format is lookin good :) The Steve 19:04, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

Not since July 15th. While the idea of puting the years in separate tables makes sense, the seemingly-random arrangement of columns is really ugly. RossPatterson 00:59, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've adjusted the tables to be the same layout for all years, and it looks much better to me. RossPatterson 01:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing that. When the tables were changed it bugged me that they weren't all the same. Dismas|^(talk) 01:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centerfold List?[edit]

Can we have a list of just the Playmates of the Month? CFLeon 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It would just repeat what's already here. Dismas|^(talk) 21:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pics[edit]

You should put a cover pic for each issue --Jaysscholar 19:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We can't. It's been tried in the past and then they were taken out. Under the rules of fair use for which magazine covers are used, there has to be some sort of critical commentary on the issue pictured, which this list does not do. Dismas|^(talk) 21:12, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy store links[edit]

Why do we have links to each issue at the Playboy Store? Does that seem like advertising to anyone else? Dismas|^(talk) 02:02, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see where you're coming from, but I guess the most reliable source is on the store's website. Ohyeahmormons 19:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source for what? Are you thinking in terms of using it as a reference? Dismas|^(talk) 02:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I think that because it's the official store of Playboy, it makes all the information reliable. Ohyeahmormons 19:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we're using it as a reference, shouldn't it be in a references section then? Granted, I don't want a huge list of references, one line for each month, at the bottom of the list, but one blanket statement would be fine with me. That would tone down the advertising feel. Dismas|^(talk) 19:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...And then, two years later, I removed the links. Following rationale: 1) Rather clear WP:ELNO spam problem, 2) all the Playboy Store ones were no longer hitting the intended target (they redir to the Store front page), 3) recent trend has been to update the table without adding the links to the store, indicating the list functions just fine without them. Townlake (talk) 02:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

20 questions[edit]

I added a 20 questions section with all the subjects in it, because if we can have an interview column, why not a 20q one? Ohyeahmormons 19:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"...why not a 20q one?" - Good; you have 19 left. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.64.0.252 (talk) 22:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of people in Playboy 1953–59 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]