Talk:Phonation

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force (assessed as High-importance).

Opera

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles

Physiology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Archives

1

Additinoal ref[edit]

The following may be of interest in ref'ing or editing this article:

Gerratt & Kreiman, 2001. "Toward a taxonomy of nonmodal phonation", Journal of Phonetics 29:365–382

— kwami (talk) 23:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Built In Play Buttons for Variations in Laryngeal Setting?[edit]

It would be very nice to have sound samples for not just separate phonemes, but also for variations in laryngeal setting. It's kind of hard to judge from text alone what's the acoustic difference between breathy and slack phonation, for example, or what does stiff voice actually sound like. These could feature the same segment spoken in each laryngeal setting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.237.127.17 (talk) 19:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Write an article that readers can understand?[edit]

In order to get anything from reading this article, you need to know so much about the subject already that you really don't need to read this this article. PiCo (talk) 06:14, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I too found this article extremely difficult to follow. I feel like almost every word needs to be read. As the overview of the field I feel it should be more digestible. Jnfrank (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neurochronaxic theory[edit]

Does this article really need to have a section on neurochronaxic theory? It was discredited at least 50 years ago. It's a bit like having a section on flat-earth theory in a geography article. RoachPeter (talk) 12:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If nobody wants to defend it, I'll delete it. RoachPeter (talk) 08:18, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Banner photos of vocal fokds[edit]

Reading this (on the mobile app) quite prominently features the top picture of vocal folds, which I find to be a bit offputting. Perhaps they don't need to be featured quite as prominently (I.e., they perhaps don't need to be a banner above the article.) Jnfrank (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hovering over link shows israeli flag?[edit]

dont know how to fix it but just making people aware 104.148.141.169 (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've purged the cache so it should be fixed now. Nardog (talk) 02:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]