Talk:Battle of Five Forks

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 1, 2008, April 1, 2015, April 1, 2019, and April 1, 2023.

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Five Forks a Decisive Victory

The Battle of Five Forks is a decisive victory for the Union as, said in the introduction paragraphs in the beginning of the article: " Pickett's loss at Five Forks triggered Lee's decision to abandon his entrenchments around Petersburg and begin the retreat that led to his surrender at Appomattox Court House on April 9."--Red Wiki 14:49, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

We are using the result cited by the NPS. Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map?

A map might be useful. Valetude (talk) 03:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Task force?

The article refers to Sheridan's command as a "task force," which is the proper term by current standards. However, I don't think that the term was in use at the time. If not, wouldn't it be better simply to call it V Corp, as that appears to be what it was. JDZeff (talk) 20:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of Five Forks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030402031837/http://www2.cr.nps.gov/abpp/battles/va088.htm to http://www2.cr.nps.gov/abpp/battles/va088.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New shortened lede 16/8/18

The old lede was longer and more detailed than any lede ought to be. It may have been roughly in proportion to the length of the article, but I feel that the article itself was far too long, bringing in many events before and after, which were not strictly on-topic. Valetude (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on the article length, way too long.Mtsmallwood (talk) 00:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Petersburg and Five Forks" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Petersburg and Five Forks has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 16 § Petersburg and Five Forks until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:46, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]