Talk:The Style Invitational

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Recent edits ...[edit]

... have been remarkably precise; might the E. have been moonlighting here? Sfahey 21:09, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

empress?[edit]

nahhh...it's well written. Maybe Chucksmith?

Ouch. The E's ears have a remarkably long range, you know.

Guilty as charged[edit]

I cannot tell a lie. I did some tweaking (as the mysterious 4.248.216.250). -eck

The Czar[edit]

Contrary to what the article said (until I deleted it a moment ago), Gene Weingarten has not admited to being the Czar. Here's a note from the Post web site ([1]) that might have been the source for the claim:

Post writer outs SI Czar: In what will almost certainly be called "Stylegate" by unimaginative members of the media, Gene Weingarten has been exposed as the Czar of the Style Invitational, a confidential informant from Washington Post states. In a Live Online chat, the informant, Deep tHroat (DH), then stated to "Bowie, Md.," whose name is derived from the letters in Woodward and Bernstein, that he was aided and abetted the Czar by providing some of the cheap crap that passes for prizes in the weekly feature.

Bowie, Md.: [DH], did you see yesterday's Style Invitional contest? The prize for this week is the board game associated with the film "How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days." I know your cubicle is next to Gene Weingarten's, who frequently finds prizes for the Invitational Czar. Did paramount really send you that game in hopes it would turn your brain to mush BEFORE watching that waste of celluloid?

DH: [blah, blah, blah...] And yes, Gene Weingarten (who is proud of his inability to appreciate any movie that he identifies as a chick flick) sits next to me, and he readily appreciates the junk I send him for his Invitational contests.

Gene Weingarten: I don't see your point at all. I have never denied my connection to the Czar. If you are referring to his calling it "my' contest, well it is. It is your contest, too.

RossPatterson 20:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HOLD THE BUS: Read this great 1999 article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/11/15/AR2005111500459_pf.html), in which Gene states: "I run a reader-participation contest every Sunday in The Post. It is called The Style Invitational."

How much more Out can you get?

Merge from The Czar of the Style Invitational[edit]

I've proposed that the Czar article be merged into this one. My reasons include:

There's almost nothing in that article that isn't already here.
The Czar doesn't have an existence independent of the contest.
The Czar hasn't run the contest for years.
The Empress article was recently redirected to the Czar.
The Uncle doesn't have an article of his own either.

All of which strongly suggests that the Czar article should be merged into this one. RossPatterson 18:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Merge 'em. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 15:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can improve this article[edit]

I can improve this article and hope that you will let me. I love this article and the contest and really can help it. So I will and have make edits. It is fun. Love, Wikipedia. Cowback23451 (talk) 19:52, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing this article or you will be blocked. Smartyllama (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mention the Style Conversational?[edit]

Should this be updated to include mention of the Style Conversational--the Empress's weekly online-only article telling more about the new contest, the most recently-posted results, and the best of the entries which were unprintable due to the WashPost's standards? I think it merits inclusion... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.15.255.227 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Style Invitational. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927002646/http://www.gopherdrool.com/loserpedia/pmwiki.php?n=Loserpedia.RookieOfTheYear to http://www.gopherdrool.com/loserpedia/pmwiki.php?n=Loserpedia.RookieOfTheYear

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]