Talk:Burlingame Treaty

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Treaty details were drawn from the 1911 encyclopedia. Bill 15:20 13 Jul 2003 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burlingame Treaty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030327090833/http://immigrants.harpweek.com:80/ChineseAmericans/2KeyIssues/BurlingameTreaty1868.htm to http://immigrants.harpweek.com/ChineseAmericans/2KeyIssues/BurlingameTreaty1868.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Add reactions section?[edit]

Was just reading in The New Immigration Federalism by Pratheepan Gulasekaram and S. Kartick Ramakrishnan that anti-Chinese sentiment in California was so strong at the time of the treaty that it "galvanized significant backlash in the state, ranging from rioting and lynching, to legislative efforts to curb what many argued were the deleterious effects of Chinese migration on California's economy and society." I believe including a section on this part of American history is important to keeping our long history with xenophobia visible so we don't repeat it. Thoughts? Perhaps a subsection of the "Impact" section? Footnote reference from this quote cites Laws Harsh as Tigers by Lucy Salyer which I've added to my to-read list but not sure when I'll circle back. -kim. (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]