Talk:Milarepa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tibetan names[edit]

Untitled[edit]

How should we handle tibetan names like Jetsun Milarepa? My feeling is that especially where there is a conventional English spelling that should be used, and there is a case for using eg Wylie transliteration as well (as for example Pinyin is used in articles on Chinese topics as well as more common anglicized spellings , but what about wiriting it in Tibetan script, possibly as well? Billlion 18:25, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I must add that Pinyin has been adopted so well in the English language that most Anglicized spellings are now obsolete. Even then, Anglicized spellings that are more common are still used on Wikipedia, e.g. Confucius, Mencius, etc. If we can do this for Pinyin, we can do this for Wylie, which is basically not used to name people or places outside of linguistics-related contexts. -- ran (talk) 00:33, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
Doch, all academic papers on history, religion, and philosophy also use Wylie and only Wylie. It just so happens that fewer Anglophones read Tibetan than Chinese. While I agree that words that are well established yak, Dalai Lama, possible Milarepa, should be spelled as they are in English, the number of such words must be admitted to be no more than a dozen. Any one who claims that there is a well established spelling for Sangs-rgyas Rgya-mtsho in English is simply pulling my leg. Is it not better to use the Wylie before an erroneous spelling does in grain itself into English. --Nathan hill 13:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I also repeat this post for the Benefit of clarity (since it is mainly about Mila), and refer interested readers to the Tibet discussion page.

You seem not to have minded my other changes to the Mi-la-ras-pa article, and indeed appear to have kept all of the Wylie (just moved to parentheses). So perhaps you did not find my edit so obnoxious as you have here implied. I admit I had qualms about Milarepa, because while not as well established as Dalai Lama it is certainly better established than Shigatse. If the encyclopedia had all of the Tibetan articles under the correct spelling, with ad hoc alternative spellings on redirect pages, or in parentheses this would seem far more scientifically acurate and truthful than to do the opposite. Those people who perfer incorrect spellings would sill be able to find their articles and although their innocent eyes would be exposed to the preceived infelicity which is the truth of Tibetan phonology, they could also sill see how these words are pronounced by ignorami.
p.s. I should point out that although Milarepa is well known Thöpaga (Thos-pa dga') is not, and how do you expect English speakers, who have no dierises (except in words like naiev where it has a different function) in their language to know what you mean by that diacritic.
p.s. I must be given some credit for not changing Gengis Khan to Činggis Qaɣan which is after all the correct spelling. --Nathan hill 13:52, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Milarepa Movie[edit]

I removed a link to the milarepa movie but it was just re-added. I had removed it as promotional. But I'd like other's opinions on this as well. The movie does present a traditional view of the biography of milarepa and I personally think it's a beautiful film, well executed, visually stunning, and not particularly controversial in its view. But I'm also wary of link spam and promotion on the Wikipedia generally. What do you think? Include it? Exclude it? If I don't hear any additional thoughts I may just remove it again after some time. - Owlmonkey (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe create article "Milarepa (movie)" and add "otheruses" at the beginning?--Tadeusz Dudkowski (talk) 11:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milarepa and the demons[edit]

Hi Owlmonkey, what is to be said about that link here Inviting the demon. (Milarepa, Tibetan Buddhism)(The Shadowissue) Judith Simmer-Brown, Parabola Vol.22 No.2 (Summer 1997) pp.12-18 ?

Austerlitz -- 88.72.27.48 (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
could be used as a citation to add something about milarepa? - Owlmonkey (talk) 03:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, most probably. It can be used as an external link, too. that's what I did. Austerlitz -- 88.75.92.10 (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I think it's more boarder-line as an external link. Have you read the WP:EL guidelines recently? I take the guideline to suggest that external links about the subject are ok if they're encyclopedic in nature. But when they just describe a particular aspect or add a piece of information, it's better to add what they point out in the article itself and use them as a citation instead. Otherwise, we would just include all citation sources as external links. So there is some kind of distinction between what is linked to in the external link section and what is a citation. I love Professor Simmer-Brown's writing, but that article she wrote is I think more of a citation source than an encyclopedic summary of Milarepa's life. But I leave it up to you. - Owlmonkey (talk) 20:28, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. The following citation
" Having proclaimed the fearlessness which he had discovered in his
           practice, Milarepa followed the training given him by his guru. He 
           invited the demons to stay with him and to receive his hospitality. 
           He also challenged them to a friendly contest of teachings. 
           Ye ghosts and demons, enemies of the Dharma, I welcome you today! It 
           is my pleasure to receive you! I pray you, stay; do not hasten to 
           leave; We will discourse and play together. Although you would be 
           gone, stay the night; We will pit the Black against the White 
           Dharma, And see who plays the best. Before you came, you vowed to 
           afflict me. Shame and disgrace would follow If you returned with 
           this vow unfulfilled.(10)"
is just too long. Additionally the whole story -which to me has been the core of Milarepa's accomplishment- should be inserted into the article somehow. It is lacking.
Austerlitz -- 88.75.68.164 (talk) 09:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the red link the four karmas still does not work.

Austerlitz -- 88.72.22.81 (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case somebody wants to produce a wikilink referring to the four karmas: Mahakala, The Mahakala and the Four Karmas of Transformation, Inviting the demon. (Milarepa, Tibetan Buddhism)(The Shadowissue) Judith Simmer-Brown, Parabola Vol.22 No.2 (Summer 1997) pp.12-18.

Austerlitz -- 88.75.65.253 (talk) 07:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I humbly disagree that the demon story is at the core of his accomplishment. I do see it, however, as an excellent teaching on how tantric buddhism leans into emotional discord instead of renouncing emotionality. if you see the demons as aspects of one's own mind, there is a natural tendency to deny and push those aspects of one's self away. we don't like to see our shadow side, as jung suggested, but instead we deny it. yet here milarepa is saying to invite these aspects of ourself that we usually deny and overcome our fear of them, and low and behold they disappear on their own - it removes the energy that we've been giving them - except for the very last one which we have to put our very head into its mouth and offer ourselves up. I suspect that last demon represents ego-clinging itself, and reaching complete enlightenment requires overcoming that clinging to self. But however you interpret the story, it is a famous one and sums up quite a lot of the tantric view in my opinion concerning emotions. I don't think the four karmas relate particularly to that story though, aside from seeing activity as non-dual. - Owlmonkey (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that Milarepa played with himself while pitting the black against the white dharma. But one never knows. Maybe his black magic/sorcery-dharma played and discussed with his white magic/buddhist-karma. Is this tantric?

Austerlitz -- 88.75.65.253 (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's tantric to see that the common thread of continuity (tantra) is beyond good and bad, black and white, that within all experience there is wisdom and the very nature of mind. true renunciation is complete openness to experience, beyond accepting and rejecting specific experiences. - Owlmonkey (talk) 20:02, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Buddha Shakyamuni has rejected the influence of Mara because he was convinced that he/she wanted to prevent him from reaching his goal. But he has not been a tantric, has he not? Austerlitz -- 88.75.215.112 (talk) 11:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well the official statement from the tantric traditions is that the Buddha taught tantra from the beginning, but I don't know of any academic / scholarly views that support that. However, the sentiment I think is compatible with the story of his overcoming the four Mara's (or four challenges of Mara), if you see the four Mara's as arising from one's own mind. Pride, Lust, etc. Buddha overcame them not by pushing them away, but by not engaging them or rather by transmuting them (in the case of anger / arrows for example). So that's quite compatible to the story of the demons in the cave I think. Same principle. - Owlmonkey (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well Owlmonkey, let's try to talk a bit about the content/meaning of black and white Dharma. Do you know sort of glossary giving an explanation of the buddhist meaning? (What is this Extract from the autobiography of the Fifth Dalai Lama called Dukulai Gosang, Volume Kha, Lhasa Publication? black or white? or someother?
Austerlitz -- 88.75.72.76 (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jomolungma —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.75.91.178 (talk) 10:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of "black and white dharma" particularly. Though protector practices are pretty gothic to my western cultural background, their intention as far as I can tell is not harmful but more transmuting and waking up sharply when obscuration and obstacles are the most thick. For example, when someone is losing everything from alcoholism, tough love is necessary to help them snap out of it. One must tell them directly how much they're hurting those around them, the damage that they're doing, and maybe even set tough boundaries or refuse to reinforce or enable their behavior. So gentle support and encouragement is not effective in situations like that, tough love is necessary. But to be dharmic, it can only be out of love not selfishness. At least that is my rough understanding. - Owlmonkey (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not able and I don't want to answer to your words right now; [2]. Milarepa didn't speak english, so he has not said Black dharma or White dharma. His language was Tibetan, was it not? What has he said then?

Via footnote no.10 Simmer-Brown refers to "The Tale of Red Rock Jewel Valley".

(7.) This is drawn from "The Tale of Red Rock Jewel Valley," 

           Chapter I of Chang, op. cit., pp. 1-7. 
           (8.) Ibid., p. 1. 
           (9.) Ibid., p. 7. 
           (10.) Ibid.

I never heard about this story before. is it western? Can you find it?

Austerlitz -- 88.75.200.77 (talk) 08:44, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe these links might be helpful, [3], [4].

Austerlitz -- 88.75.200.77 (talk) 08:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milarepa[edit]

http://lamapalmo.googlepages.com/lifestoriesofthegreatfemalemasters - this link is not welcome to the mainpage.

Austerlitz -- 88.75.71.123 (talk) 20:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[5] " Main Students

The eight great sons: 

   * Je Gampopa, the sun-like son
   * Rechungpa, the moon-like son

and the star-like sons: 

   * Ngendzong Repa Jangchub Gyalpo
   * Repa Shiwa Ö
   * Seban Repa
   * Kyira Repa
   * Drigom Repa
   * Repa Sangye Khyab"

Do you know the meaning of "sun-like son" and "moon-like son"?

By the way, here you can find "The four highly developed daughters: 

   * Tshonga Rechungma
   * Nyanang Sale O
   * Chung Paldar Bum
   * Peta Gonkyi".
Austerlitz -- 88.75.204.73 (talk) 11:15, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here [6] is the story milarepa meets paldarbum, and here [7] milarepa meets rechungma and here [8] the story of sale öo. These are the first three of the above mentioned "highly developed daughters".

I don't remember who and why deleted my weblink to LamaPalmos "Some female disciples of Milarepa". Is it a blog, that is a private discussion site?

Austerlitz -- 88.75.70.184 (talk) 14:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked it up on the history page, [9], but I don't understand the reason given.

Austerlitz -- 88.75.70.184 (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think googlepages web pages are banned generally from the EL links section, but i don't know the history of that. a few other domains are similarly banned i've noticed. - Owlmonkey (talk) 17:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peta Gonkyi was Milarepas sister, [10], [11].

Austerlitz -- 88.72.7.230 (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted ("Milarepa about himself in old age")[edit]

[1]

  1. ^ [1]

why?

Austerlitz -- 88.72.18.42 (talk) 20:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this somehow the "wrong" Karmapas Face?

-- 88.72.18.42 (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand what you are asking. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I get it now. I didn't delete anything. I just moved the quote to his young life section since the info was more relevant there. A random quote floating under a sub-heading looks weird. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 21:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
According to my taste it didn't look weird, but we can leave it where you put it. Actually I thought you deleted the whole of it, being fixed to the place I had put it I even didn't check some other place this time. But, tell me, does the citation mean "lamenting" to you? You write: "Milarepa later lamented his evil ways in his older years."
Austerlitz -- 88.75.221.68 (talk) 09:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The four enlightened activities[edit]

  • The Black Crown of the Karmapas see also: The Four Enlightened Activities: "The prongs of the vajra represent the four enlightened activities of pacifying, enriching, magnetizing and destroying."
Austerlitz -- 88.75.210.225 (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

googlebooks 

Von Mi-la-ras-pa,Garma C. C. Chang]
Austerlitz -- 88.75.64.202 (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Milarepa and the demons Here Simmer-Brown is quoting from the book of Chang, I think: 

       " Having proclaimed the fearlessness which he had discovered in his

          practice, Milarepa followed the training given him by his guru. He 
          invited the demons to stay with him and to receive his hospitality. 
          He also challenged them to a friendly contest of teachings. 
          Ye ghosts and demons, enemies of the Dharma, I welcome you today! It 
          is my pleasure to receive you! I pray you, stay; do not hasten to 
          leave; We will discourse and play together. Although you would be 
          gone, stay the night; We will pit the Black against the White 
          Dharma, And see who plays the best. Before you came, you vowed to 
          afflict me. Shame and disgrace would follow If you returned with 
          this vow unfulfilled.(10)"

I wrote above: "Via footnote no.10 Simmer-Brown refers to "The Tale of Red Rock Jewel Valley".

(7.) This is drawn from "The Tale of Red Rock Jewel Valley," 

          Chapter I of Chang, op. cit., pp. 1-7. 
          (8.) Ibid., p. 1. 
          (9.) Ibid., p. 7. 
          (10.) Ibid."

Or: is the Tale of the Red Rock Jewel Valley not part of the book?

Before you came, you vowed to 

         afflict me. Shame and disgrace would follow If you returned with 
         this vow unfulfilled.(10)"

I am really impressed with this. Is this heavenly compassion?

Austerlitz -- 88.75.64.202 (talk) 17:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

"Milarepa is famous for many of his songs and poems, in which he expresses the profundity of his realization of the dharma with extraordinary clarity and beauty."

Who says so? This is not NPOV. The last phrase should be deleted or attributed to a respected source.Rep07 (talk) 02:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Unconventional," and a general lack of references[edit]

hi, i know nobody's really paying attention to this article, but regardless i'd like to just question the purpose of the article's Unconventional section. not sure what exactly the significance is of this single anecdote -- seems very out of place to me. this article is already a little bit questionable, so any inspection could result in improvement. would somebody with more knowledge on the subject like to comment?

also, while we're at it, i would like to encourage fellow editors to research the claims in this article and provide sources to match them; or, if it's found to be totally unsourceable, at least stick it with a [citation needed].

--Foodlegs (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Milarepa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issues[edit]

This article has been tagged for neutrality, yet no rationale has been given. Therefore, I'll remove that tag. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:26, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Milarepa&oldid=1194491088"