Talk:Henry Charles Carey

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography assessment rating comment[edit]

The article may be improved by following the WPBiogaphy 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 00:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Print-more-money-and-we-will-be-richer.

The article on Carey seems to be based on an uncritical acceptance of the fallacy that creating more money makes people better off. More Greenbacks would have prevented control of the economy by "British Capitalists", hard times are caused by banks "not providing the public with all the money they need" and on and on.2.221.143.240 (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The only reference to permission to use this material is:

" The preceding article is a rough version of the article that appeared in The American Almanac. It is made available here with the permission of The New Federalist Newspaper. Any use of, or quotations from, this article must attribute them to The New Federalist, and The American Almanac."

Some Thoughts/Any Carey Experts?[edit]

I would like to contest the idea that the law of diminishing returns is a "universal truth." This is really a political economist's way of looking at it; but Henry Carey is a physical economist. Besides that, even the law of diminishing returns page questions whether this is a law. If truth be told, Marx himself did not think this was a law, rather, a mere function of the rise in constant capital in any capitalist system, with the resulting fall in variable, and, thenceforth, the loss of surplus-value to the capitalist. I am sure Carey has a solution to the law, but I haven't read enough of Carey to ascertain this. Will anyone be offended if we omit it? Please provide some explication. If we converse without "debating", things might even prove to be greatly enjoyable. And if I don't receive some responses within a few days, I may take it upon myself to delete it. Matthew 06:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am traducing my Kids Economy Books from Carey and Larouche Economy. Here they are. I am correcting these books but Kids Economy is near to be finished. I am an english beginner. Also i have found a thesis free on the web that i have linked here. Matthieu Giroux —Preceding undated comment added 18:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]