Talk:Mistley Towers
A fact from Mistley Towers appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 January 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Thanks for input, anon, but I changed "the original church was small and fit between the two towers" back to original form "fitted" for two reasons: 1) Please respect original choice of style, "fitted" is a correct form, and 2) to avoid distracting the reader into envisaging a church that's small and fit..! ;-)--Bishonen | Talk 18:10, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
The reference to Pavillion leads to a disambiguation page, on which none of the choices seem to fit the context here. I think the reference on this page wants to link to something more specific. Is that something not yet written, perhaps a page about Pavillion as an architectural style? 20.137.18.50 15:41, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I have just written Pavilion, casino in response to the above point. Giano 16:21, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mistley Towers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050502184351/http://www.mistley-manningtree.co.uk/mistley_towers.htm to http://www.mistley-manningtree.co.uk/mistley_towers.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)