Talk:Contemporary (magazine)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contemporary (magazine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Candidate for JAODN:
[edit]The newest modern style that is possible to conjur or fathom. Usually associated with more wealthy present taste.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Stirling Newberry (talk • contribs) 17:05, 2 January 2005
Coatrack
[edit]I have removed the following
Contemporary attracted controversy recently with an apparent puff piece on Torrie Begg, a little known English artist, in issue 94. The lavish, multi-page feature was unstintingly praising of Begg's work. Torrie Begg is Brian Mūller's partner.
which appears to be a WP:Coatrack of some issue. Toddst1 (talk) 13:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Contemporary (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516072501/http://www.contemporary-magazine.com/ to http://www.contemporary-magazine.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)