Talk:Legends!

Redirect

I'm changing the redirect to legend. Why is it linking to myth? I have no idea. Perhaps there is a good reason. Then shoot me (or revert the page).

Collins Diary section

I think the section violates several Wikipedia guidelines, including:

Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources (WP:NPS)--"In Wikipedia articles, quotes of any original texts being discussed should be relevant to the discussion (or illustrative of style) and should be kept to an appropriate length";

Verifiablity (WP:VERIFY)--"Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed.";

Possible copyright violation (WP:COPY) -- "If you use part of a copyrighted work under "fair use", or if you obtain special permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright holder under the terms of our license, you must make a note of that fact (along with names and dates)."

Violation of "Undue Weight" (WP:UNDUE)-- "Neutrality requires that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each."

Given the above, I propose to delete the entire section under "Collins Diary" and include, instead, a brief paragraph about the diary and Collins' thoughts, as printed in an article in the Daily Mail, July 14, 2007, titled "Battle of the Superbitches". (Not on-line, I got it through Lexis-Nexis.) I also propose to search for anything Evans may have said, in a Reliable Source (of course). I'll wait at least a few days before I do anything. JeanColumbia (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

Feel free to comment at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Legends!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]