Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple koosh

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 01:36, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Purple koosh

Bandity. "Purple koosh" +Barkmeier gets zero Google hits. RickK 05:14, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, band vanity, fails to establish notability as per WP:NMG. Google search turns up many results about jewellery. --bainer 05:26, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 06:11, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No allmusic.com entry. Gamaliel 06:16, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mayathebee 06:39, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete.EvilPhoenix
• Delete, vanity. Columbia 07:35, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, concur vanity. --Jamyskis 09:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. PedanticallySpeaking 16:21, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Why? RickK 04:30, May 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of influence, national/international tours, recording contract. Average Earthman 18:38, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Let me just stress - 'influencing' a scene which doesn't have an article, that I've never heard of and Google does not appear to have noticed does not count in my opinion. Average Earthman 18:40, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:34, 2005 May 13 (UTC)
• Delete →Iñgōlemo← ^talk 04:58, 2005 May 18 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.