Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requests for summaries
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Wikipedia:Requests for summaries[edit]
This page is marked as inactive. It looks bad to leave dead collaboration pages lying around; they are depressing and de-motivating, and also cause confusion and sometimes wasted effort. The requests that currently sit here unattended should be divided up among the appropriate active pages mentioned in the header (or wherever else might be appropriate) and then this page can go away. -- Beland 12:31, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Delete unless I'm missing something.Abstain Wyss 21:51, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)- Object to listing: VfD has no authority over anything other than the main name space; if you want people to not use it, put a note at the top, as normal. James F. (talk) 02:27, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Keep: I'd much rather see this revived than removed. And that sort of thing happens now and then. Even if it's a bit moribund right now, that's better handled with a notice to that effect and an invititation to revive it than by throwing away a good idea. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:46, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Concur with Jmabel. Keep. VfD isn't for wikipedia namespace pages. Start up a poll or discussion about it. Mgm|(talk) 17:34, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, in fact can't we just remove the VfD tag and delete this from here? Dan100 12:08, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This is absurd. Andre (talk) 21:21, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.