Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All you want to know about lucid dreaming

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.

While there were several votes for "merge", I could find no content worth merging that made the Lucid dreaming article better even if the existence of the book were verified (which it has not been). Rossami (talk) 06:10, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

All you want to know about lucid dreaming[edit]

No google hits for author+title. --W(t) 00:57, 2005 May 19 (UTC)

Unencyclopedic article title turns out to be the title of a book. One that was published, it says. No indication of notability, no google hits for exact title, nor for author's name + "lucid dreaming". Delete unless verified, in which case expand. Barno 01:13, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I also cannot find any matches on Amazon.com. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:43, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If verified merge with Lucid dreaming under the Books section. Sairen42 05:39, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Concur with Sairen42 -- otherwise exterminate --Fred_the_Dalek 07:31, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with Fred_the_Dalek. --Jacobw 10:53, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - 'no googles no entry' --Doc Glasgow 16:04, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge only if verified --Doc Glasgow 08:20, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Lucid dreaming, no redirect. Megan1967 06:41, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
del r3m0t ^talk 05:59, May 24, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.