Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T'plana'hath

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 18:04, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)

T'plana'hath

it can be merged with Vulcan (Star Trek) Melaen 21:09, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• (it can also be spelled backwards, but why should it be done?) 62.46.117.225 13:18, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • LOL
• There are three separate references to T'plana'hath in Star Trek, over two films and a TV series, set in three eras. That seems like a significant, canonical character to me. Do not delete. KingOfAllPaperboys
• It's also a significant ship to make first contact with humans. Do not delete. Commander 17:22, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 23:56, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or keep canonical things from fiction. Kappa 01:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Gamaliel 01:24, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and expand. Megan1967 03:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:FICT. Radiant_* 13:31, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge (keeping redirect) as Melaen suggested. King and Commander above gave reasons for notability within this very popular fiction, but WP:FICT guidelines make this a merge rather than keep, and it's not trivial enough to delete. Barno 15:26, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable in it's own right. can, and should, be expanded. --Irishpunktom\^talk 09:44, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.