Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecademy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete (NB. page could not be deleted due to technical limitations). Rje 02:23, Mar 25, 2005 (UTC)

Ecademy

advertising cruft for a not-very-notable cite. delete --Milyle 23:36, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Vanity advertisement. Delete Tygar 23:35, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, ad. Wyss 00:14, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete vanity ad. --Deathphoenix 18:28, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Blatant ad. Glennwatkins 02:34, 10 Mar 2005 (GMT)
• Keep, This page has seen a running battle between disgruntled ex-members and staff. I agree that the current piece reads like an Ad but I'd call it plain rather than blatant vanity. it might be helpful to compare it with the page about Orkut which is a similar community. And note also that the comment immediately above this one is apparently from glennwatkins, the name of the MD, although emphatically not him but rather, a fake. jbond 14:24, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.