Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Holt

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 23:00, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

Michael Holt

Non notable, possible vanity. --Briangotts 21:41, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Keep Holt is in the second round of the World Snooker Championships, he has been a snooker pro for 8 years, he is 29th in the world rankings (provisionally 27th and could conceivably be in the top 16 "elite" next season). I fail to see how he is not notable: BBC News World Snooker 1 World Rankings

• So why isn't that information in the article? ---Isaac R 23:28, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• It is --Dhowdon 23:51, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Certainly if players such as Tony Drago have profiles (Drago has never won a ranking tournament in 20 years of being a pro) then Holt should have an entry --Dhowdon 22:01, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Passes Pokemon test. Snookachu Klonimus 05:12, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep -- notable enough. - Longhair | Talk 12:24, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• keep its notable too Yuckfoo 00:46, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Career as professional snooker player makes him notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 03:43, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.