Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony DiPierro/George Elliot Clarke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED.
User:Anthony DiPierro/George Elliot Clarke[edit]
Seems to duplicate article on George Elliot Clarke.--BrentS 18:16, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - this is most likely just a draft. Users keep this sort of material within their subpages routinely. Lacrimosus 19:48, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. What Lacrimosus said. —Mar·ka·ci 20:14, 2005 Jan 31 (UTC)
- Keep. He is probably just preparing an edit in his user space, which is a perfectly reasonable way to use it. A lot of people do this. --BM 20:18, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It's in his User space. RickK 00:52, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Userspace. - RedWordSmith 01:30, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. People can do what they like in their user space within very, very broad limits. Anything that looks even vaguely related to a legitimate Wikipedian purpose is fine. Basically the only things that are out of bounds are using megabytes and megabytes of space, or something clearly non-Wikipedia related like maintaining your church's newsletter archives there, or something grotesquely antisocial. This page should not have been nominated for deletion. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:30, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- If he's preparing an edit, he needs to know that an article already exists at George Elliott Clarke (two t's). But, yeah, keep user subpages; there's no real reason to delete them. Bearcat 03:01, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Comment: What gives? Can we speedy delist vfd's targetting User subpages? This seems to be a waste of time. —RaD Man (talk) 10:19, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- It's a copy of this, which was previously deleted, blanked, and protected. I copied over the text for the duration of the undeletion discussion. Now that it has been undeleted, it is no longer necessary, and I have marked it as a speedy. anthony 警告 13:36, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- And I have deleted it. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 15:31, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.