Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladys Warhol

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete mikka (t) 04:22, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Gladys Warhol

I don't know whether Tubgirl is notable (and I don't care)- but I doubt anyone will search for her as googleless 'Gladys' --Doc (?) 00:40, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete almost certainly an attack, and on the 0.00001% chance that it's true, would still be not-notable and unencyclopedic. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:07, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Looks like the article is now tagged as speedy delete since the original author blanked the page. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Now that the article has been restored, delete as it is an attack page. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:08, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverifiable, probable attack page. (At least I don't want to be tasked with verifying this.) AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 01:53, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per User:Android79. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:08, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete attack page. --Xcali 14:57, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Since we have a consensus that this is an attack page - can it be speedied for the sake of the victim?? --Doc (?) 15:42, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No verifiable references yet presented. Likely attack page, therefore untrue, therefore vandalism, therefore a valid candidate for speedy deletion. So I've speedy-deleted it. Dpbsmith (talk) 16:25, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.