Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Common blue damselfly02.jpg
Common Blue Damselfly[edit]
a Wikipedia:Featured picture
Two good shots clearly illustrating the characteristic of the damselfly - namely to fold its wings vertically to its body when at rest as opposed to a dragonfly's horizontly orientated wings. The images show that the wings don't necessarily fold ontop of the body, but can stick out on top of the body aswell (common blue damselfy02).
- Support. Self Nom. --Fir0002 10:13, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support! (topmost one (*02) especially) - [[User:Bevo|Bevo]] 02:44, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support bottom photo. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 02:45, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Support top photo. (there's always trouble with two pics to consider). -- Solipsist 10:49, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support top, very nice. I should note that the article on the damselfly could really use some work, the picture needs to illustrate an article, but currently there's just a substub. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 16:05, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Top picture has better composition. ed g2s • talk 20:31, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Top one is indeed better. James F. (talk) 23:09, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support top one -- Chris 73 Talk 04:17, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)
- Support top image, though would crop ULH corner out and adjust saturation and contrast just a hair. Denni☯ 17:02, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC)
- Support Top photo. --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 03:59, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support top one. It's got a bit better contrast and light. The second damselfly is shy and looks away from the camera ;) Janderk 12:06, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support top one, better colors balance. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 12:33, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Wow. Matthewcieplak 02:02, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
