Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch

	This page falls within the scope of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style, a collaborative effort focused on enhancing clarity, consistency, and cohesiveness across the Manual of Style (MoS) guidelines by addressing inconsistencies, refining language, and integrating guidance effectively.Manual of StyleWikipedia:WikiProject Manual of StyleTemplate:WikiProject Manual of StyleManual of Style articles
	This page falls under the contentious topics procedure and is given additional attention, as it closely associated to the English Wikipedia Manual of Style, and the article titles policy. Both areas are known to be subjects of debate. Contributors are urged to review the awareness criteria carefully and exercise caution when editing.
	For information on Wikipedia's approach to the establishment of new policies and guidelines, refer to WP:PROPOSAL. Additionally, guidance on how to contribute to the development and revision of Wikipedia policies of Wikipedia's policy and guideline documents is available, offering valuable insights and recommendations.

Text has been copied to or from this page; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.

Copied Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms (history) → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch) (diff)
Copied Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms (history) → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch) (diff)
Copied Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words (history) → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch) (diff)
Copied Wikipedia:Words to avoid (history) → Wikipedia:Manual of Style (words to watch) (diff)

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14

See also related discussions and archives:

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Addition to Note C suggestion[edit]

I notice the {{Like whom?}} template is missing from Note C, which reads: The templates {{Who}}, {{Which}}, {{By whom}}, or {{Attribution needed}} are available for editors to request an individual statement be more clearly attributed. Also, the template {{Where}} is similarly nowhere on the page. Not a big deal I suppose, just pointing this out. 5Q5|^✉

Feedback requested at Talk:Ahomisation[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ahomisation#Neologism as title. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 03:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Mos:RT" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Mos:RT has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Mos:RT until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Mos:Neo" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Mos:Neo has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 25 § Mos:Neo until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:RACIST" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Wikipedia:RACIST has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30 § Wikipedia:RACIST until a consensus is reached. --MikutoH ^talk! 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]