User talk:Charles Matthews

• /About me
• /Plaudits

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite Victoria County History

Template:Cite Victoria County History has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of List of mathematical theories for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mathematical theories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mathematical theories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

D.Lazard (talk) 08:50, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins

Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

• Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
• Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
• Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
• Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
• Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
• Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
• Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
• Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed

See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Subject about article

Hi @Charles Matthews can you see and check my sandbox please i think this article is good i want know your opinion

thank you Skymansky3 (talk) 09:13, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

@Skymansky3: Your article doesn't have the required type of referencing. See WP:INTREF4. Self-published contributions to sites aren't enough. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

@Charles Matthews Is there a chance to be in the draft? Can you do that? Skymansky3 (talk) 09:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

@Skymansky3:Frankly, the draft needs to rewritten completely. At present there is hardly a sentence in it that belongs in Wikipedia. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

if you have time can you put some edits please in it that belongs in Wikipedia Skymansky3 (talk) 09:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, you have not shown the notability of the topic. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:46, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your time Skymansky3 (talk) 09:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margaret Nevinson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages King's Speech and Asquith administration.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)