Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simpson v. Savoie

Renominating Simpson v. Savoie and the redirect Simpson vs. Savoie. Concensus last time was delete if not verified. I asked for everyone's patience to attempt a paper search for this case. I have now exhausted the resources that I'm willing to put into the effort. I can neither prove nor disprove the factual accuracy of this article. Recommend delete. (Prior discussions are at Talk:Simpson v. Savoie.) Rossami 04:08, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)

• Delete: unverified. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:54, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless verified. Possible fiction - not listed in cases at CyberLibel (a Canadian lawyer's site). --Zigger 19:15, 2004 May 3 (UTC)
  • Delete. No reference given. Dubious source. Case not mentioned on relevant websites. No voters have claimed that the case ever existed. Article confuses slander and libel (deliberately?), making it even less likely. --Zigger 22:03, 2004 May 11 (UTC)
• Delete. -Sean Curtin 05:08, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• All right, at this point, delete. Everyking 05:48, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• The previous deletion debate on this subject was never closed. See Talk:Simpson v. Savoie and the note at the top of Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old. I believe Rossami was in the process of requested verification on the article. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 12:47, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, at long last, as unverifiable. - Lucky 6.9 19:20, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable! -- Cyrius|✎ 20:40, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. On top of that, I don't think that it is Wikipedia's vocation to be the encyclopedia of judicial precedents. --Alexandre 08:26, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Which should have happened long ago by reason of lack of encyclopedic worthiness. - Centrx 19:43, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)