Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemorphs
Pokemorphs was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Delete
Pokemorphs[edit]
Article about a non-notable online role-playing game. Gazpacho 06:06, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Apparently not just a MUSH (as the article suggested) but a widespread Pokemon/Animorphs/furry fanfiction synthesis. No vote yet. Gazpacho 10:35, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete,
Wikipedia is not an Internet directory.fanficruft. —No-One Jones (m) 06:17, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC) - Delete. Appears to be from the fanfic community. --Improv 06:49, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable. Ian Pugh 07:08, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete; Agreed. Krupo 07:24, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep and improve in order to centralize all the related articles on Pokemorphs. Why is it necessary to VFD an article within only a few hours of this page's existence? Should have been referred to a subject matter group, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon. -- Netoholic @ 08:23, 2004 Nov 2 (UTC)
- Delete. It can't be improved, it's self proclaimed fan fiction. Wikipedia is not for fan fiction. Average Earthman 12:33, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- "self-proclaimed fan fiction" ? The nominator of this VFD, Gazpacho, himself added that to the article... .is that confirmed? -- Netoholic @ 06:41, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC)
- POKEMORPHS BOOKS are written by Melissa, who is 14 years old and lives in South Australia [1]. Perhaps slightly more than fanfiction, they still don't look notable to me. The article certainly shouldn't be the fiction version that it is - if it's a product of note (which I don't think it is), talk about the product. Average Earthman 12:36, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- They're not actually books - they're online stories. Or at least they were, but the web site is gone. Andre (talk) 23:40, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
- POKEMORPHS BOOKS are written by Melissa, who is 14 years old and lives in South Australia [1]. Perhaps slightly more than fanfiction, they still don't look notable to me. The article certainly shouldn't be the fiction version that it is - if it's a product of note (which I don't think it is), talk about the product. Average Earthman 12:36, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- "self-proclaimed fan fiction" ? The nominator of this VFD, Gazpacho, himself added that to the article... .is that confirmed? -- Netoholic @ 06:41, 2004 Nov 3 (UTC)
- Delete. Pokemon fanfic fancruft. What's next, an article on Pokegirls? — Gwalla | Talk 22:27, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. --*drew 01:28, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete... or merge with Internet (kidding) Ashibaka ✎ 20:04, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. [[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 21:17, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Jayjg 03:25, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete fanficcruft. —tregoweth 04:26, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Not important. --Evice 06:51, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Fiction is a valid topic. --L33tminion | (talk) 22:00, Nov 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. I know we don't have nearly enough Pokemon on wikipedia; if only there were a way to recruit more fanatics.... -R. fiend 06:47, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. This is fan fiction, but more importantly it's non-notable fan fiction. This is coming from a guy who has heard of it before and who was formerly an operator on the #pokemorphs IRC channel. No actual books were ever published, the website is currently nonexistent, and the creator has stopped writing the stories. Andre (talk) 23:38, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.